Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Experimental Protocol for Examining Behavioral Response Profiles in Larval Fish: Application to the Neuro-stimulant Caffeine
Published on: July 24, 2018
Derivation of the minimal magnitude of the Critical Effect Size for continuous toxicological parameters from
H E Buist1, G Frhr von Bölcsházy, M Dammann
1Food and Chemical Risk Analysis, TNO Quality of Life, Utrechtseweg 48, Zeist 3700 AJ, The Netherlands. harrie.buist@tno.nl
Abstract:
Assuming that temporal fluctuations in physiological parameters (e.g. haematology, biochemistry) in individual healthy non-exposed animals are non-adverse, the minimal magnitude of the Critical Effect Size (CES) for a number of continuous parameters of toxicity studies was derived. A total of 36 studies (19 pharmaceutical preclinical studies in dogs and 17 chemical risk assessment studies in rats) were analysed to determine within-animal variation in their control groups. Minimal CES-values were derived for each group of studies, differentiating where necessary between strains and sexes, using the 2.5 percentile (lower limit) and/or 97.5 percentile (upper limit) of the distribution of the within-animal variation around the mean of each parameter. We concluded that minimal CES-values for continuous clinical chemistry and haematology parameters should be established separately per species, strain, sex and study duration investigated. Grouping of minimal CES-values, leading to more or less "general" values, seems possible for those parameters that are subject to tight homeostatic control and consequently show little within-animal variation. Nearly a quarter of the proposed CES-values is 5%, nearly a quarter range from 6% to 10%, a quarter is 15% or 20%, and nearly 30% of the proposed values is 20% of the mean of the control animals.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model
Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations

