Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026
Measuring the Motor Aspect of Cancer-Related Fatigue using a Handheld Dynamometer
Published on: February 20, 2020
The concurrent validity of a hand-held versus a stationary dynamometer in testing isometric shoulder strength
Jean-Sébastien Roy1, Joy C MacDermid, Brock Orton
1School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. jean-sebastien.roy.1@ulaval.ca
Study Design:
Clinical Measurement-Validity.
Introduction:
Validity of the JTech PowerTrack II hand-held dynamometer (JTech; JTech Medical, Salt Lake City, UT) for measuring shoulder strength has yet to be established.
Purpose Of The Study:
To examine the concurrent validity of isometric strength scores obtained with the JTech PowerTrack II, and on a stationary dynamometer, the LIDO WorkSET (LIDO; LoredanBiomedical, West Sacramento, CA).
Methods:
Thirty-eight subjects performed three maximal efforts of shoulder flexion, abduction, and external rotation on a single occasion on the two dynamometers. Two testers were randomly assigned to administer the tests.
Results:
Pearson correlations between the scores on the two dynamometers (r.0.81) indicated a good concurrent validity. Correlations were similar when the results were subdivided by tester or gender.
Conclusions:
This study suggests that either the JTech PowerTrack II or LIDOWorkSET provide comparable scores for shoulder strength. Although not interchangeable because of the differences in units of measurement, the relative conclusions about strength should be similar, regardless of which instrument is used.
Level Of Evidence:
Not applicable.
