Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

A Wind Tunnel for Odor Mediated Insect Behavioural Assays
Published on: November 30, 2018
Naïve bats discriminate arctiid moth warning sounds but generalize their aposematic meaning
Jesse R Barber1, Brad A Chadwell, Nick Garrett
1Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA. barber.jesse@gmail.com
Abstract:
Naïve red (Lasiurus borealis Müller) and big brown (Eptesicus fuscus Beauvois) bats quickly learn to avoid noxious sound-producing tiger moths. After this experience with a model tiger moth, bats generalize the meaning of these prey-generated sounds to a second tiger moth species producing a different call. Here we describe the three-dimensional kinematic and bioacoustic details of this behaviour, first, as naïve bats learn to deal with an unpalatable model tiger moth and subsequently, as they avoid acoustic mimics. The tiger moths' first clicks influenced the bats' echolocation behaviour and the percentage of interactions that included terminal buzzes was associated with capture and investigatory behaviour. When the mimic was introduced, the bats decreased both their minimum distance to the tiger moth and the time at which they broke off their attack compared with their exposure to the model on the night before. These kinematic signatures closely match the bats' behaviour on their first night of experience with the model. Minimum distances and time of pursuit cessation increased again by the last night of the mimic's presentation. These kinematic and bioacoustic results show that although naïve bats generalize the meaning of aposematic tiger moth calls, they discriminate the prey-generated signals as different and investigate. Extrapolating to experienced bats, these results suggest that acoustic predators probably exert potent and fine-scaled selective forces on acoustic mimicry complexes.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
Pollination and Flower Structure
Frequency-dependent Selection

