Should a head-injured child receive a head CT scan? A systematic review of clinical prediction rules

Jonathon L Maguire1, Kathy Boutis, Elizabeth M Uleryk

  • 1Division of Pediatric Medicine and the Pediatric Outcomes Research Team (PORT, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Pediatrics
|July 1, 2009
PubMed

Insights

This study reviewed clinical prediction rules for head-injured children, finding two high-quality rules for general use and one for minor head injuries. Further validation is needed, especially for young children.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Emergency Medicine
  • Clinical Decision Support
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

  • Cranial computed tomography (CT) scanning in children with head trauma carries risks from radiation and sedation.
  • Uncertainty exists regarding which pediatric patients necessitate cranial CT scans.
  • High-quality clinical prediction rules could aid in decision-making for CT use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review the quality and performance of published clinical prediction rules for intracranial injury in children with head injury.
  • Evaluate existing prediction rules for their applicability and accuracy in pediatric head trauma cases.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search of Medline and Embase databases (December 2008).
  • Inclusion criteria: clinical prediction rules for children (0-18 years) with head injury history.
  • Assessment of prediction-rule quality using 14 established items and performance evaluation based on sensitivity and predicted CT scan frequency.

Main Results:

  • Eight clinical prediction rules were identified from 3357 assessed titles/abstracts.
  • Two rules demonstrated high quality and performance for children of all ages/trauma severities.
  • One rule showed high quality and performance for minor head injuries (Glasgow Coma Scale >or=13).
  • No identified rules met adequate quality or performance standards for young children.

Conclusions:

  • Significant variability exists in the quality and performance of existing clinical prediction rules for pediatric head injury.
  • Future research should focus on validating high-quality, high-performance rules in diverse populations.
  • Development of a robust clinical prediction rule is needed specifically for young children with head injuries.
Abstract