Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Assessment of Neuromuscular Function Using Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
Published on: September 13, 2015
[Influence of neuromuscular blockade on motor evoked potential of forearm muscles]
Ni Chen1, Shou-Jing Zhou, Hui-Chang Yan
1Department of Anesthesiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Objective:
To investigate the influence of different degrees of neuromuscular blockade on motor evoked potential (MEP) of forearm muscles under the same condition of anesthesia depth and analgesia.
Methods:
Forty ASA I - II patients aged 20 - 60 underwent general anesthesia via intravenous injection of propofol, fentanyl, and vecuronium to achieve the bispectral index (BIS) at the level of (50 + 10) during neurosurgical operation. The patients were all given fentanyl infusion at a rate of 2 microg/kg/h during the operation and continuous vecuronium injection while the value of train of four stimulations (TOF) was monitored under 3 different levels: TOF = 4 (TOF(4)), TOF = 2 (TOF(2)), and TOF = 0 (TOF(0)). The values of amplitude and latency at the 3 forearm muscles, forearm flexors (FF), abductor pollicis brevis (APB), and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) were monitored and compared under stable hemodynamic status.
Results:
There was no significant differences in the latency of compound muscle action potential (CMAP) between the anesthesia status TOF(4) and anesthesia status TOF(2) in FF, APB, and ADM (all P > 0.05). The amplitude of CMAP deceased gradually as the degree of neuromuscular blockade increased in FF, APB, and ADM (all P < 0.05). CMAP could not be recorded when the value of TOF was 0 (P < 0.01).
Conclusion:
Neuromuscular blocking drugs significantly depress the MEP in a dose-dependent manner. Intra-operatively it may be preferable to maintain the value of TOF not less than 2 during the critical periods of MEP monitoring.
More Related Videos
09:14Surface Electromyographic Biofeedback as a Rehabilitation Tool for Patients with Global Brachial Plexus Injury Receiving Bionic Reconstruction
Published on: September 28, 2019
04:30Stimulated Single Fiber Electromyography (SFEMG) for Assessing Neuromuscular Junction Transmission in Rodent Models
Published on: March 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Neuromuscular Junction And Blockade
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...
Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because succinylcholine...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacokinetics
Instead, they are transported by the blood to different tissues. Muscles with a greater blood supply (arteries) and blood flow receive more...
Classification of Skeletal Muscle Relaxants
Peripherally acting skeletal muscle relaxants interfere with the neurotransmission at the neuromuscular end plate to induce paralysis during...