Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
Published on: November 26, 2015
The obligation to participate in biomedical research
G Owen Schaefer1, Ezekiel J Emanuel, Alan Wertheimer
1Department of Bioethics, The Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Abstract:
The current prevailing view is that participation in biomedical research is above and beyond the call of duty. While some commentators have offered reasons against this, we propose a novel public goods argument for an obligation to participate in biomedical research. Biomedical knowledge is a public good, available to any individual even if that individual does not contribute to it. Participation in research is a critical way to support an important public good. Consequently, all have a duty to participate. The current social norm is that individuals participate only if they have a good reason to do so. The public goods argument implies that individuals should participate unless they have a good reason not to. Such a shift would be of great aid to the progress of biomedical research, eventually making society significantly healthier and longer lived.
Related Concept Videos
Biodiversity and Human Values
Ethics in Research
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks

