Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026
Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
[Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical
Hong-xian Lu1, Ya-xia Chen, Juan Ni
1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310006, China.
Objective:
To assess the high risk factors associated with the positive margin of conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).
Methods:
From January 2000 to February 2008, 1699 consecutive patients with CIN undergoing conization was reviewed retrospectively in order to analyze the relationship between the positive margin of conization with clinical prognostic factors, such as patients age, disease grade, size of lesion, the procedure of excision and menopause. chi2 tests was used to compare the different frequencies of factors in groups of positive and negative margin conization, then seven factors with positive margin were processed into unconditional logistic regression analysis.
Results:
The rate of the positive margin in 1699 patients was 14.01% (238/1699). The mean age of patients with positive margins was (39+/-9) years old, while patients with negative margins was (39+/-8) years old, which didn't reach statistical difference (P>0.05). The rate of the positive margin was 8.63% in cold knife cone (CKC) and 18.66% in loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), which showed significant difference (P<0.01). Among 1699 patients, 90 patients were with CINI, 339 patients were with CIN II, 1113 patients were with CIN III [including 972 with severe dysplasia and 141 with cancer in situ (CIS)], 87 patients were with cervical cancer stage Ia1, 70 patients were with stage Ia2 or advanced stages. The rate of positive margin was 1.11% (1/90), 3.83% (13/339), 10.70% (104/972), 26.24% (37/141), 35.63% (31/87) and 74.29% (52/70), respectively. There was statistic difference among them, except CINI and CINII. When combined CIN I with CIN II, then compared with CIN III, cervical cancer with Ia1 and Ia2, it also showed statistical difference (P<0.05). The rate of positive margin in postmenopausal women was 21.54% (28/130), which was significantly higher than 13.38% (210/1569) in premenopausal women (P=0.010). The logistic regression analysis showed that the procedure of excision, grade of disease, size of lesion, surface of cervix, and menopause were high risk factors associated with the positive margin, the risk ratio were 5.147, 3.048, 1.271, 1.905 and 1.860, respectively.
Conclusions:
High grade, the extent of CIN disease, LEEP and postmenopausal age are high-risk factors associated with positive margin in patients treated by conization. It should be warranted in those patients when designing conization treatment.
