Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Convenience Sampling Method00:55

Convenience Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population.
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A reporting checklist for large language models in behavioural science.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

A Framework for Considering the Value of Race and Ethnicity in Estimating Disease Risk.

Annals of internal medicine·2025
Same author

No news is good news? The declining information value of broadcast news in America.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Automated reminders reduce incarceration for missed court dates: Evidence from a text message experiment.

Science advances·2025
Same author

A simple, statistically robust test of discrimination.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Racial Bias in Clinical and Population Health Algorithms: A Critical Review of Current Debates.

Annual review of public health·2024
Same journal

Checking Genetic Homogeneity Between Two Samples Using Summary Statistics With Application to Mendelian Randomization.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian Learning Model for Joint Risk Prediction of Alcohol and Cannabis Use Disorders.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Reluctant Transfer Learning in Penalized Regressions for Individualized Treatment Rules Under Effect Heterogeneity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Predictor-Assisted Nonparametric Graphical Models With Multivariate Error-Prone Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Treatment Decision Estimation for Right-Censored Survival Data Through Parameter Transfer Learning.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Latent Class Log-Linear Models for Estimating Diagnostic Test Accuracy Without a Gold Standard: A Simulation Study.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Structure-Based Simulation and Sampling of Transcription Factor Protein Movements along DNA from Atomic-Scale Stepping to Coarse-Grained Diffusion
09:17

Structure-Based Simulation and Sampling of Transcription Factor Protein Movements along DNA from Atomic-Scale Stepping to Coarse-Grained Diffusion

Published on: March 1, 2022

Respondent-driven sampling as Markov chain Monte Carlo.

Sharad Goel1, Matthew J Salganik

  • 1Yahoo! Research, New York, NY 10018, U.S.A.

Statistics in Medicine
|July 3, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a popular method for studying hidden populations. This research reveals that network bottlenecks, not just disease segregation, significantly impact RDS estimate variance, offering new insights for study design.

More Related Videos

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Structure-Based Simulation and Sampling of Transcription Factor Protein Movements along DNA from Atomic-Scale Stepping to Coarse-Grained Diffusion
09:17

Structure-Based Simulation and Sampling of Transcription Factor Protein Movements along DNA from Atomic-Scale Stepping to Coarse-Grained Diffusion

Published on: March 1, 2022

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Social Network Analysis
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a widely adopted chain-referral sampling method for estimating disease prevalence in hidden populations.
  • RDS relies on a snowball mechanism where existing participants recruit new ones, posing challenges for statistical inference.
  • Understanding factors influencing the variance of RDS estimates is crucial for accurate population health assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) through the lens of Markov chain Monte Carlo importance sampling.
  • To investigate the impact of network structure and recruitment strategies on the variance of RDS estimates.
  • To identify key factors beyond disease segregation that affect the reliability of RDS data.

Main Methods:

  • Modeling RDS as a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) importance sampling process.
  • Developing illustrative models to examine network structure effects on sampling variance.
  • Analyzing the influence of recruitment procedures, including multiple recruitments, on estimate precision.

Main Results:

  • Network bottlenecks, irrespective of disease status segregation, can substantially increase the variance of RDS estimates.
  • Common recruitment practices, such as encouraging multiple referrals, can inflate estimate variance.
  • The structure of the social network plays a critical role in the precision of disease prevalence estimates derived from RDS.

Conclusions:

  • Network topology and recruitment dynamics are critical determinants of Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) accuracy.
  • Recommendations are provided for optimizing RDS study implementation and evaluation to mitigate variance.
  • This work advances the statistical understanding of RDS, offering practical guidance for researchers in epidemiology and public health.