Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Chinese Herbal Retention Enema for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis
Published on: May 16, 2025
A randomized controlled trial of enemas in combination with oral laxative therapy for children with chronic
Marloes E J Bongers1, Maartje M van den Berg, Johannes B Reitsma
1Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Insights
For severely constipated children, adding rectal enemas to oral laxative treatment did not improve overall success rates compared to oral laxatives alone. Enemas did not offer additional benefits for children refractory to standard treatment.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Clinical Trial Research
- Bowel Management
Background:
- Up to 30% of children with constipation experience unsuccessful outcomes despite intensive oral laxative use.
- Children with refractory constipation may benefit from rectal evacuation methods like enemas.
- This study investigated enemas as an adjunct to oral laxatives in severely constipated children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of rectal enemas combined with oral laxatives versus oral laxatives alone in treating severe functional constipation in children.
- To evaluate the impact of additional enema therapy on defecation frequency, fecal incontinence, and overall treatment success.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 100 children (aged 8-18 years) with at least 2 years of functional constipation.
- Participants were assigned to either a control group (oral laxatives, education, behavioral strategies) or an intervention group (same as control plus 3 rectal enemas/week, gradually reduced).
- Outcomes, including defecation and fecal incontinence frequency and overall success, were assessed over 52 weeks.
Main Results:
- While defecation frequency improved in both groups, it was significantly higher in the enema group at 26 and 52 weeks (P=.02).
- No significant differences were observed in the reduction of fecal incontinence episodes (P=.49) or overall success rates (P=.67) between the groups.
- After one year, the overall success rate was 47.1% in the intervention group versus 36.1% in the control group.
Conclusions:
- Adding regular rectal enemas to conventional oral laxative therapy does not provide additional benefits for severely constipated children.
- The study found no significant improvement in overall success rates or reduction in fecal incontinence with the addition of enemas.
- Conventional oral laxative treatment alone appears to be as effective as when combined with enema maintenance therapy for this patient population.
Background & Aims:
After 5 years of intensive oral laxative use, up to 30% of constipated children still have an unsuccessful outcome. Children refractory to oral laxatives might benefit from regular rectal evacuation by enemas. This randomized controlled trial compared the effects of additional treatment with rectal enemas (intervention) with conventional treatment alone (oral laxatives, control) in severely constipated children.
Methods:
In a tertiary hospital in the Netherlands, 100 children, aged 8-18 years, with functional constipation for at least 2 years were randomly assigned to intervention or control groups. The control group received education, behavioral strategies, and oral laxatives. The intervention group was also given 3 rectal enemas/week, reduced by 1 enema/week every 3 months. Outcome measures were defecation and fecal incontinence frequency and overall success at 12, 26, 39, and 52 weeks. Overall success was defined as 3 or more defecations/week and less than 1 fecal incontinence episode/week, irrespective of laxative use.
Results:
Defecation frequency normalized in both groups but was significantly higher in the intervention group compared with controls at 26 and 52 weeks (5.6 vs 3.9/week, P = .02, and 5.3 vs 3.9/week, P = .02, respectively). There were no significant differences between groups in reduction of fecal incontinence episodes (P = .49) and overall success rates (P = .67). After 1 year of treatment, the overall success rate was 47.1% in the intervention group versus 36.1% in the control group.
Conclusions:
There is no additional effect of enemas compared with oral laxatives alone as maintenance therapy for severely constipated children.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Bulk-Forming and Stimulant Laxatives
Bulk-forming laxatives, such as psyllium, methylcellulose, and polycarbophil, absorb water in the intestine, increasing stool bulk and promoting bowel movement. This makes...
Drugs for Treatment of Diarrhea-Predominant IBS
Two specific drugs used in the treatment are alosetron (Lotronex) and eluxadoline (Viberzi). Alosetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, works by slowing the movement of stools in the gut, reducing bowel...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Other Laxatives
Osmotic or saline laxatives, like magnesium hydroxide or milk of...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Adsorbents as Antidiarrheal Agents
Adsorbents...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Opioids as Antidiarrheal Agents
Opioids, widely used antidiarrheal agents, mitigate diarrhea by slowing down...