Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacodynamic Models: Link Model and Systems Pharmacodynamic Model01:14

Pharmacodynamic Models: Link Model and Systems Pharmacodynamic Model

The link model is a fundamental pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) approach to account for delayed drug responses when the observed effect does not immediately correlate with the drug's plasma concentration peak. This delay is mathematically addressed by introducing an effect compartment concentration, Ce, which is kinetically linked to the plasma concentration, Cp, via a first-order rate constant, ke0. The linkage allows for a more accurate prediction of drug effects over time. A higher...
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling01:27

¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling

The coupling interactions of nuclei across four or more bonds are usually weak, with J values less than 1 Hz. While these are usually not observed in spectra, the presence of multiple bonds along the coupling pathway can result in observable long-range coupling.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Phase Transitions02:31

Phase Transitions

Whether solid, liquid, or gas, a substance's state depends on the order and arrangement of its particles (atoms, molecules, or ions). Particles in the solid pack closely together, generally in a pattern. The particles vibrate about their fixed positions but do not move or squeeze past their neighbors. In liquids, although the particles are closely spaced, they are randomly arranged. The position of the particles are not fixed—that is, they are free to move past their neighbors to occupy...
Phase Transitions01:21

Phase Transitions

A phase transition is the process in which a substance changes from one state of matter to another, like from a solid to a liquid, liquid to gas, or vice versa, at a specific temperature and under given pressure conditions. This change is spontaneous and is affected by alterations in temperature and pressure. These parameters impact the strength of the forces between molecules (intermolecular forces) in the substance.During a phase transition, both the initial and final phases of the substance...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview01:27

Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview

Pharmacodynamic (PD) responses describe the interaction between a drug and its biological target, culminating in a physiological effect. These responses can be classified into different types: continuous variables, such as blood glucose levels; categorical outcomes, like survival rates; and time-to-event metrics, such as disease progression. Understanding and modeling PD responses are critical for optimizing drug efficacy and safety.PD models describe the relationship between drug concentration...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SMAS: Structural MRI-based AD Score using Bayesian supervised VAE.

Computers in biology and medicine·2025
Same author

Gaussian Process-based prediction of memory performance and biomarker status in ageing and Alzheimer's disease-A systematic model evaluation.

Medical image analysis·2023
Same author

Noradrenergic neuromodulation in ageing and disease.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2023
Same author

Pulsatility Index in the Basal Ganglia Arteries Increases with Age in Elderly with and without Cerebral Small Vessel Disease.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2022
Same author

The utility of Magnetoencephalography in multiple sclerosis - A systematic review.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2021
Same author

Dietary patterns are related to cognitive functioning in elderly enriched with individuals at increased risk for Alzheimer's disease.

European journal of nutrition·2020
Same journal

Detection of cochlear microphonic for differential diagnosis between auditory neuropathy mice and noise-induced sensorineural hearing loss mice.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same journal

Assessment metrics for pain control in rats: A methodological commentary.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same journal

Infant EEG preprocessing pipelines: A capability framework and current gaps in practice.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same journal

Methods for Measuring Neural Activity During Voluntary Wheel Running.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same journal

Serotype-dependent differences in AAV cellular transduction rates in the hypothalamus of Arctic ground squirrels.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
Same journal

Rapid generation of human sensory neurons from iPSC for modeling of peripheral neuropathies.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

New Framework for Understanding Cross-Brain Coherence in Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Hyperscanning Studies
05:59

New Framework for Understanding Cross-Brain Coherence in Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Hyperscanning Studies

Published on: October 6, 2023

Dynamic Causal Models for phase coupling.

W D Penny1, V Litvak, L Fuentemilla

  • 1Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. w.penny@fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk

Journal of Neuroscience Methods
|July 7, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study extends Dynamic Causal Modelling for phase-coupled data, using oscillator models to reveal brain synchronization mechanisms like master-slave versus mutual entrainment.

More Related Videos

Age-dependent Dynamics of Locomotion in Caenorhabditis elegans: A Lyapunov Exponent Analysis
06:44

Age-dependent Dynamics of Locomotion in Caenorhabditis elegans: A Lyapunov Exponent Analysis

Published on: September 23, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

New Framework for Understanding Cross-Brain Coherence in Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Hyperscanning Studies
05:59

New Framework for Understanding Cross-Brain Coherence in Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Hyperscanning Studies

Published on: October 6, 2023

Age-dependent Dynamics of Locomotion in Caenorhabditis elegans: A Lyapunov Exponent Analysis
06:44

Age-dependent Dynamics of Locomotion in Caenorhabditis elegans: A Lyapunov Exponent Analysis

Published on: September 23, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Systems Neuroscience

Background:

  • Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) is a framework for inferring directed connectivity from neuroimaging data.
  • Analyzing phase-coupled data in neural networks presents unique challenges for existing models.
  • Understanding neural synchronization mechanisms is crucial for cognitive neuroscience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend the Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) framework for the analysis of phase-coupled neural data.
  • To investigate the underlying mechanisms of neural synchronization, differentiating between master-slave and mutual entrainment.
  • To validate the extended DCM approach using both synthetic and empirical neuroimaging data.

Main Methods:

  • A weakly coupled oscillator approach was employed to model dynamic phase changes in neural networks.
  • Bayesian model comparison was utilized to infer the most likely synchronization mechanisms.
  • The extended DCM framework was applied to synthetic data from physiological models and Magnetoencephalography (MEG) data.

Main Results:

  • The extended DCM framework successfully analyzed phase-coupled data, providing insights into synchronization dynamics.
  • Results demonstrated the ability to distinguish between different neural entrainment mechanisms.
  • The approach showed efficacy on both simulated and real-world MEG data from a visual working memory task.

Conclusions:

  • The extended DCM framework offers a powerful new tool for analyzing phase-coupled neural activity.
  • This method advances our understanding of how synchronization processes are orchestrated in the brain.
  • The findings have implications for studying brain network dynamics in various cognitive functions.