Diathermy training and usage trends among surgical trainees--will we get our fingers burnt?

We aimed to assess the current trends in diathermy use as well as the presence or absence of formal diathermy training amongst higher surgical trainees (HSTs) in the UK.

A national e-mail survey was implemented, contacting 300 randomly selected HSTs in general surgery. A questionnaire was used to ascertain their current practice and the presence or absence of formal diathermy training.

Overall 126 (42%) HSTs across all levels of training and subspecialty interests responded. Only 50.8% stated they had received formal diathermy training whereas 49.2% had no formal training. Diathermy is used by 23.8% of responders for laparotomy skin incisions, while 76.2% use a scalpel. For colonic mobilisation, 49.2% use diathermy and 50.8% scissors. For rectal mobilisation 55.5% use diathermy, 42.9% scissors and 1.6% a harmonic scalpel. Nearly 90% of responders do not place diathermy pads on the patient themselves, 68.3% do not routinely check diathermy equipment before use and 66.7% do not check the diathermy pad site at the end of the operation. Only 80.9% stated that a diathermy complication is the surgeon's responsibility, while the remaining 19.1% would blame the scrub nurse, circulating nurse, operating department assistant (ODA), manufacturer or a combination of the above.

Nearly half of HSTs in this study did not receive any training in the use of diathermy, resulting in failure to adhere to what is considered best practice. This may lead to adverse events for the patient along with medico-legal consequences. This problem could be overcome by ensuring HSTs receive adequate formal diathermy training and we suggest that a dedicated diathermy course is incorporated in basic surgical training curricula.