Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data01:12

Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data

Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data involves studying the behavior of drugs within diverse populations to understand their pharmacokinetic parameters. Traditional pharmacokinetic methods typically involve collecting samples from a few individuals and estimating these parameters. While these methods are commonly used, they have limitations in capturing the variability in drug response among individuals or heterogeneous populations. Population pharmacokinetics is employed to address these...
The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes02:45

The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes

In most organisms, sex is determined by the ratio of X and Y chromosomes. However, in some organisms, such as Drosophila and C.elegans, sex is determined by the ratio of the number of X chromosomes to the number of sets of autosomes. The Y chromosome in Drosophila is active but does not determine sex. It contains genes responsible for the production of sperms in adult flies.  
Normal male Drosophila has a ratio of one X chromosome to two sets of autosomes. In contrast, normal female Drosophila...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ensembling Unets for Rare Chromosomal Aberration Detection in Metaphase Images, Uncertainty Quantification, and Ionizing Radiation Dose Estimation.

Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology·2026
Same author

Virtual reality as a pedagogical approach for critical reflection: a case study on learning about homelessness in health professions education.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same author

Optimization of fecal near infrared spectroscopy for predicting organic matter digestibility in cows using local algorithms.

Journal of animal science·2026
Same author

"No Safe Place to Call": Perspectives and Experiences of Access to Mental Health Services by People Found not Criminally Responsible on Account of a Mental Disorder.

International journal of forensic mental health·2026
Same author

Practical Guidance for Initiation and Management of Patients on Once-Nightly Sodium Oxybate for Narcolepsy Treatment: Modified Delphi Panel Consensus Recommendations.

Neurology and therapy·2026
Same author

Comparison of the biocompatibility profiles of synthetic polysulfone and polyethersulfone dialysis membranes.

Clinical kidney journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

Strategy for population triage based on dicentric analysis.

Aurélie Vaurijoux1, Gaëtan Gruel, Frédéric Pouzoulet

  • 1Laboratoire de Dosimétrie Biologique, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France. aurelie.vaurijoux@irsn.fr

Radiation Research
|July 8, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Automated dicentric chromosome scoring software improves accuracy in radiation dose assessment after accidental overexposure. This advanced method offers faster and more reliable triage and individual dose estimation compared to manual scoring techniques.

More Related Videos

Analysis of Side Population in Solid Tumor Cell Lines
06:26

Analysis of Side Population in Solid Tumor Cell Lines

Published on: February 23, 2021

Microsatellite DNA Genotyping and Flow Cytometry Ploidy Analyses of Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Hydatidiform Molar Tissues
11:54

Microsatellite DNA Genotyping and Flow Cytometry Ploidy Analyses of Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Hydatidiform Molar Tissues

Published on: October 20, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

Analysis of Side Population in Solid Tumor Cell Lines
06:26

Analysis of Side Population in Solid Tumor Cell Lines

Published on: February 23, 2021

Microsatellite DNA Genotyping and Flow Cytometry Ploidy Analyses of Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Hydatidiform Molar Tissues
11:54

Microsatellite DNA Genotyping and Flow Cytometry Ploidy Analyses of Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Hydatidiform Molar Tissues

Published on: October 20, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cytogenetics
  • Radiation Biology
  • Medical Physics

Background:

  • Accurate radiation dose assessment is critical after large-scale accidental overexposure.
  • Current manual methods for dicentric chromosome scoring have limitations in speed and accuracy for triage and dose estimation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of automated dicentric scoring software for radiation dose assessment.
  • To compare automated scoring with traditional manual scoring methods.

Main Methods:

  • Developed and tested automated dicentric scoring software on victims of a radiation accident in Dakar.
  • Performed manual scoring of 50 and 500 metaphases for comparison.
  • Compared dose classifications from manual and automated scoring methods.

Main Results:

  • Manual scoring of 50 metaphases resulted in 50% misclassification for dose categories.
  • Automated scoring showed only 4.35% misclassification compared to manual scoring of 500 metaphases.
  • Automated scoring demonstrated high accuracy and significantly reduced assessment time.

Conclusions:

  • Automated dicentric scoring software is a more accurate method for radiation triage than manual scoring of 50 metaphases.
  • The software provides accurate individual dose estimation, comparable to manual scoring of 500 metaphases, but is substantially faster.
  • This technology enhances radiation accident response capabilities.