Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
First Impression01:09

First Impression

First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
False Memories01:18

False Memories

False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceptions of "Stealthing" in Civil Court.

Violence against women·2025
Same author

Legal Decision-Making in an Adult Rape Case Involving DNA Evidence.

Violence against women·2024
Same author

Racial bias in jury selection hurts mock jurors, not just defendants: Testing one potential intervention.

Law and human behavior·2023
Same author

Predicting the risk of chest radiograph abnormality 12-weeks post hospitalisation with SARS CoV-2 PCR confirmed COVID-19.

Respiratory research·2022
Same author

The truth about snitches: an archival analysis of informant testimony.

Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law·2022
Same author

Cowitness identification speed affects choices from target-absent photospreads.

Law and human behavior·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Does post-identification feedback affect evaluations of eyewitness testimony and identification procedures?

Amy Bradfield Douglass1, Jeffrey S Neuschatz, Jennifer Imrich

  • 1Department of Psychology, Bates College, 4 Andrews Road, Lewiston, ME 04240, USA. adouglas@bates.edu

Law and Human Behavior
|July 9, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Post-identification feedback significantly influences how eyewitnesses are perceived. Confirming feedback led evaluators to judge witnesses more positively, even when instructed to ignore it, impacting accuracy and confidence assessments.

More Related Videos

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis
05:48

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Published on: August 9, 2024

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis
05:48

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Published on: August 9, 2024

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Forensic Psychology
  • Legal Psychology

Background:

  • Eyewitness testimony is crucial in legal proceedings.
  • The impact of post-identification feedback on witness evaluations has been a long-standing assumption in research.
  • Previous research has not empirically demonstrated this effect on evaluators' judgments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically test whether post-identification feedback influences how evaluators perceive eyewitnesses.
  • To determine if feedback affects judgments of witness accuracy and confidence.
  • To investigate the robustness of feedback effects, even with instructions to disregard it.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted with participants evaluating eyewitness testimony or identification procedures.
  • Experiment 1 involved evaluators assessing testimony with confirming, disconfirming, or no post-identification feedback.
  • Experiment 2 manipulated feedback during the identification procedure and included instructions to disregard feedback.

Main Results:

  • Witnesses receiving confirming post-identification feedback were consistently judged as more accurate and confident.
  • This effect persisted regardless of whether the witness's confidence statement was presented.
  • Confirming feedback led to more positive assessments even when evaluators were instructed to disregard the feedback.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides the first empirical confirmation that post-identification feedback affects judgments of eyewitnesses.
  • Feedback significantly biases perceptions of witness accuracy and confidence.
  • These findings highlight the need to consider feedback's influence in legal contexts and its resistance to corrective instructions.