Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
Does post-identification feedback affect evaluations of eyewitness testimony and identification procedures?
Amy Bradfield Douglass1, Jeffrey S Neuschatz, Jennifer Imrich
1Department of Psychology, Bates College, 4 Andrews Road, Lewiston, ME 04240, USA. adouglas@bates.edu
Abstract:
Two experiments were conducted to test whether post-identification feedback affects evaluations of eyewitnesses. In Experiment 1 (N = 156), evaluators viewed eyewitness testimony. They evaluated witnesses who received confirming post-identification feedback as more accurate and more confident, among other judgments, compared with witnesses who received disconfirming post-identification feedback or no feedback. This pattern persisted regardless of whether the witness's confidence statement was included in the testimony. In Experiment 2 (N = 161), witness evaluators viewed the actual identification procedure in which feedback was delivered. Instructions to disregard the feedback were manipulated. Again, witnesses who received confirming feedback were assessed more positively. This pattern occurred even when witness evaluators received instructions to disregard the feedback. These experiments are the first to confirm researchers' assumptions that feedback effects on witnesses translate to changes in judgments of those witnesses.
Related Concept Videos
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Halo Effect
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Blind Procedures
First Impression
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...

