Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Assisted reproductive technology.

T Tanbo¹, T Abyholm

¹National Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway.

Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology

|October 1, 1991

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Vulvovaginal photodynamic therapy vs. topical corticosteroids in genital erosive lichen planus: a randomized controlled trial.

The British journal of dermatology·2015

Same author

Maternal age and emergency operative deliveries at term: a population-based registry study among low-risk primiparous women.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2014

Same author

Placental weight in singleton pregnancies with and without assisted reproductive technology: a population study of 536,567 pregnancies.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2011

Same author

Impact of gender on vitamin D deficiency in morbidly obese patients: a cross-sectional study.

European journal of clinical nutrition·2011

Same author

Complete surgical removal of minimal and mild endometriosis improves outcome of subsequent IVF/ICSI treatment.

Reproductive biomedicine online·2011

Same author

IVF/ICSI outcome and serum LH concentration on day 1 of ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH under pituitary suppression.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2005

Same journal

Management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026

Same journal

Updates in group prenatal care research.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026

Same journal

Complex benign gynecology in perimenopause: current evidence and future directions.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026

Same journal

Role of insulin in female reproduction.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026

Same journal

Urinary tract involvement in endometriosis: current evidence and clinical insights into navigating diagnosis and management.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026

Same journal

Updates in ultrasound imaging of adenomyosis and clinical impacts.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026

See all related articles

In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) offers a successful and cost-effective treatment for tubal infertility. Promising results from IVF in unstimulated cycles may influence future treatment choices.

Area of Science:

Reproductive Medicine
Infertility Treatment
Assisted Reproductive Technology

Background:

Tubal infertility presents complex treatment decisions between surgical intervention and assisted reproductive technologies.
In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) is a widely used technique for overcoming infertility.
Advancements in microinsemination techniques are being explored for male and unexplained infertility cases.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness and cost-efficiency of surgery versus IVF-ET for tubal infertility.
To assess the outcomes of IVF in unstimulated cycles.
To review the efficacy of different embryo transfer procedures in non-tubal infertility.
To examine the potential of microinsemination techniques in specific infertility scenarios.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of surgical and IVF-ET outcomes for tubal infertility.
Review of pregnancy rates from IVF in unstimulated cycles.
Evaluation of various embryo transfer techniques in non-tubal infertility.
Assessment of subzonal insemination and partial zona dissection in male/unexplained infertility.

Main Results:

IVF-ET may be more successful and less expensive than surgery for tubal infertility with poor prognosis.
IVF in unstimulated cycles demonstrates comparable pregnancy rates to national registries.
The superiority of tubal transfer over IVF for non-tubal infertility requires further evidence.
Microinsemination techniques show promise for male and unexplained infertility with prior IVF fertilization failure.

Conclusions:

IVF-ET is a potentially superior and more economical option for specific cases of tubal infertility.
IVF in unstimulated cycles warrants further investigation for its impact on treatment selection.
Further research is needed to validate transfer procedures in non-tubal infertility.
Microinsemination techniques represent a hopeful advancement for challenging infertility cases.