Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Overview of Microscopy Techniques01:22

Overview of Microscopy Techniques

The early pioneers of microscopy opened a window into the invisible world of microorganisms. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes that leveraged nonvisible light, such as fluorescence microscopy that uses an ultraviolet light source and electron microscopy that uses short-wavelength electron beams. These advances significantly improved magnification, image resolution, and contrast. By comparison, the...
Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy01:18

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy

Optical microscopy uses optic principles to provide detailed images of samples. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek designed the first compound optical microscope in the 17th century to visualize blood cells, bacteria, and yeast cells. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes with enhanced magnification and resolution.
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Topical Piperine for the Management of Burning Mouth Syndrome: A Case Series.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Authors' Reply to 'Methodological Considerations for Surveys of Dental Students' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Artificial Intelligence in Oral Cancer Diagnosis'.

Oral diseases·2026
Same author

Pentoxifylline and Tocopherol for the Management of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ): A Retrospective Clinical Audit.

Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Evidence-Based Dentistry Among Final-Year Dental Students: A Multinational Study Across 6 Countries and 8 Universities.

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe·2026
Same author

Dental Students' Knowledge, Attitudes and Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Tools to Aid in the Diagnosis of Oral Cancer and Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders.

Oral diseases·2026
Same author

Anthropometric Indicators and Early Cardiovascular Prevention in Children and Adolescents: The Role of Education and Lifestyle.

Journal of cardiovascular development and disease·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Dynamic Navigation in Endodontics: Guided Access Cavity Preparation by Means of a Miniaturized Navigation System
07:03

Dynamic Navigation in Endodontics: Guided Access Cavity Preparation by Means of a Miniaturized Navigation System

Published on: May 5, 2022

Magnification devices for endodontic therapy.

Massimo Del Fabbro1, Silvio Taschieri, Giovanni Lodi

  • 1Department of Health Technologies, University of Milan, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, Via R Galeazzi 4, Milan, Italy, 20161.

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
|July 10, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review found no studies comparing endodontic treatment with or without magnification devices. Further research is needed to determine if magnification devices improve patient outcomes in endodontic therapy.

More Related Videos

Development of a Direct Pulp-capping Model for the Evaluation of Pulpal Wound Healing and Reparative Dentin Formation in Mice
07:07

Development of a Direct Pulp-capping Model for the Evaluation of Pulpal Wound Healing and Reparative Dentin Formation in Mice

Published on: January 12, 2017

Endaural Endoscopic Atticoantrotomy (Retrograde Mastoidectomy) using a Constant Suction Bone-drilling Technique
07:06

Endaural Endoscopic Atticoantrotomy (Retrograde Mastoidectomy) using a Constant Suction Bone-drilling Technique

Published on: May 23, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Dynamic Navigation in Endodontics: Guided Access Cavity Preparation by Means of a Miniaturized Navigation System
07:03

Dynamic Navigation in Endodontics: Guided Access Cavity Preparation by Means of a Miniaturized Navigation System

Published on: May 5, 2022

Development of a Direct Pulp-capping Model for the Evaluation of Pulpal Wound Healing and Reparative Dentin Formation in Mice
07:07

Development of a Direct Pulp-capping Model for the Evaluation of Pulpal Wound Healing and Reparative Dentin Formation in Mice

Published on: January 12, 2017

Endaural Endoscopic Atticoantrotomy (Retrograde Mastoidectomy) using a Constant Suction Bone-drilling Technique
07:06

Endaural Endoscopic Atticoantrotomy (Retrograde Mastoidectomy) using a Constant Suction Bone-drilling Technique

Published on: May 23, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Endodontics
  • Microsurgery

Background:

  • Advancements in microsurgery have spurred the search for improved visualization in endodontics.
  • Magnification devices (surgical microscopes, endoscopes, loupes) offer technical advantages to operators.
  • The impact of these devices on patient clinical and radiographic outcomes remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and compare endodontic treatment with and without magnification devices.
  • To compare different magnification devices (microscope, endoscope, loupes) used in endodontics.

Main Methods:

  • Searched Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and nine dental journals.
  • Handsearched bibliographies and contacted manufacturers and RCT authors for unpublished/ongoing trials.
  • Included randomized and quasi-randomized trials comparing endodontic therapy with or without magnification devices.

Main Results:

  • No trials met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review.
  • One randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing three magnification devices in endodontic surgery was identified but excluded.
  • No RCTs were found comparing endodontic therapy outcomes with or without magnification devices.

Conclusions:

  • No objective conclusions can be drawn due to the lack of eligible studies.
  • The effect of magnification devices on endodontic treatment outcomes is unknown.
  • Further long-term RCTs with large sample sizes are required to investigate the clinical benefits and indications for magnification devices in endodontics.