Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Flow Cytometry01:23

Flow Cytometry

The development of flow cytometry techniques began in 1934 with initial attempts by Andrew Moldavan, a bacteriologist who counted the cells in a flowing capillary system. Moldavan pumped cells through a capillary tube focused under a microscope for visualization. The invention of photometry allowed the measurement of differentially-stained cells, and Louis Kamentsky developed the first multiparameter flow cytometer in 1965 to identify and count the cancer cells in cervical tissue specimens.
In...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bayesian hierarchical models for the prediction of the driver flow and passenger waiting times in a stochastic carpooling service.

Journal of applied statistics·2023
Same author

Fast and Accurate Binary Response Mixed Model Analysis Via Expectation Propagation.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2022
Same author

Streamlined variational inference for higher level group-specific curve models.

Statistical modelling·2022
Same author

Sparse Principal Component Analysis With Preserved Sparsity Pattern.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2019
Same author

Wilhelm Roux' Archiv fur Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen·2017
Same author

Evaluating the Contributions of Individual Variables to a Quadratic Form.

Australian & New Zealand journal of statistics·2016
Same journal

Ensuring Quality in Preclinical Research: The Importance of Being Human.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Addressing Cluster-Level Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Sample Size Determination for Hierarchical 2 × 2 Factorial Designs.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

A Multiple Imputation Approach to Distinguish Curative From Life-Prolonging Effects in the Presence of Missing Covariates.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Tests for Categorical Data Beyond Pearson: A Distance Covariance and Energy Distance Approach.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Nonparametric Estimation of the Patient-Weighted While-Alive Estimand.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same journal

Two-Stage Multiple Test Procedures Controlling False Discovery Rate With Auxiliary Variable and Their Application to Set4 <math><semantics><mi>Δ</mi> <annotation>$\Delta$</annotation></semantics></math> Mutant Data.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Identifying Microglia and Peripheral Infiltrating Macrophages in the Injured Spinal Cords Using Flow Cytometry
08:47

Identifying Microglia and Peripheral Infiltrating Macrophages in the Injured Spinal Cords Using Flow Cytometry

Published on: June 24, 2025

Highest density difference region estimation with application to flow cytometric data.

Tarn Duong1, Inge Koch, M P Wand

  • 1Institut Pasteur, Groupe Imagerie et Modélisation; CNRS, URA 2582, F-75015 Paris, France.

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|July 10, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scientists can now better identify differences between flow cytometry samples using a new statistical method for highest density difference region estimation. This approach improves upon existing techniques for analyzing complex biological data.

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
10:20

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

Published on: March 24, 2023

Effective Detection of Hoechst Side Population Cells by Flow Cytometry
06:31

Effective Detection of Hoechst Side Population Cells by Flow Cytometry

Published on: August 23, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Identifying Microglia and Peripheral Infiltrating Macrophages in the Injured Spinal Cords Using Flow Cytometry
08:47

Identifying Microglia and Peripheral Infiltrating Macrophages in the Injured Spinal Cords Using Flow Cytometry

Published on: June 24, 2025

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
10:20

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

Published on: March 24, 2023

Effective Detection of Hoechst Side Population Cells by Flow Cytometry
06:31

Effective Detection of Hoechst Side Population Cells by Flow Cytometry

Published on: August 23, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Flow cytometry generates high-dimensional multivariate data (3-20 dimensions) with large sample sizes (10,000-100,000).
  • Accurate estimation of density differences between samples is crucial for scientific discovery in fields like immunology.
  • Current industry standard, Frequency Difference Gating, has limitations in identifying these critical regions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an improved statistical method for estimating the highest density difference region between two multivariate samples.
  • To provide a robust alternative to existing methods for flow cytometry data analysis.
  • To extend the applicability of density difference estimation to general multivariate random samples.

Main Methods:

  • Formalized the problem of highest density difference region estimation as a two-sample statistical problem.
  • Developed a novel estimator leveraging recent statistical advancements, including patient rule induction methods.
  • Evaluated the proposed method's performance through simulations against established techniques.

Main Results:

  • The proposed estimator demonstrated improved performance in simulations compared to the industry standard.
  • The method effectively identifies regions where multivariate sample densities differ significantly.
  • The statistical framework provides a rigorous foundation for density difference estimation.

Conclusions:

  • The novel highest density difference region estimation method offers enhanced accuracy for flow cytometry data.
  • This methodology is broadly applicable to any scenario requiring the identification of density differences in multivariate samples.
  • The study contributes a valuable new tool for statistical analysis in various scientific domains.