Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Bedside Ultrasound for Guiding Fluid Removal in Patients with Pulmonary Edema: The Reverse-FALLS Protocol
Published on: July 28, 2018
Continuous hemofiltration in 2009: what is new for clinicians regarding pathophysiology, preferred technique and
P M Honoré1, O Joannes-Boyau, V Collin
1Burn Center, Queen Astrid Military Hospital, Brussels, Belgium. patrick.honoré@mil.be
Abstract:
In the last years, publications have questioned the classical dose of 35 ml/kg, but are those studies strong enough in terms of scientific power in order to change our practice? We will try to settle some recommendations for clinicians. Manipulation of dose, porosity, and combinations have yielded promising findings. However, conclusive evidence based on randomized trials remains scarce, limiting the practical implementation in daily practice. From the few designed studies, it is safe to say that optimization of delivered dose has a proven positive effect. An ultrafiltration rate of around 35 ml/kg/h, with adjustment for predilution, can be recommended for the septic patient. Recent studies do not have enough power to change this recommendation in view of its shortcomings. Finally the recommendation is to keep going with a continuous technique, a pure continuous veno-venous hemofiltration mode, and at a dose of 35 ml/kg/h while waiting for other studies to be published.
Related Concept Videos
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Hemoperfusion and Hemofiltration
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis