Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
Perturbation measures of voice: a comparative study between Multi-Dimensional Voice Program and Praat
Youri Maryn1, Paul Corthals, Marc De Bodt
1Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Sint-Jan General Hospital, Bruges, Belgium. youri.maryn@azbrugge.be
Comparing voice perturbation measures from different systems and software reveals significant differences. Results indicate that frequency and amplitude perturbation outcomes are difficult to compare across various acoustic analysis tools.
Area of Science:
- Acoustic analysis of voice production.
- Speech-language pathology and audiology.
- Biomedical engineering and signal processing.
Background:
- Voice perturbation measures (frequency and amplitude variations) are crucial for voice disorder assessment.
- The accuracy of perturbation measures is affected by recording equipment and analysis algorithms.
- Existing computer systems and software may yield different perturbation results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare voice perturbation measures obtained from two distinct computer systems and two widely used software programs.
- To evaluate the consistency and comparability of acoustic voice analysis tools.
- To identify potential discrepancies in frequency and amplitude perturbation assessments.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of seven perturbation measures: absolute jitter, percent jitter, relative average perturbation, pitch perturbation quotient, shimmer in decibels, percent shimmer, and amplitude perturbation quotient.
- Statistical comparison of data from 50 subjects with diverse voice disorders.
- Correlation and inferential statistical analyses were performed.
Main Results:
- Statistically significant differences were observed between the two systems and the two programs.
- The Multi-Dimensional Voice Program consistently produced higher perturbation measures compared to Praat.
- Correlation analyses revealed weak to moderate relationships between systems and weak to strong relationships between programs.
Conclusions:
- Direct comparison of frequency perturbation outcomes across different systems and programs is challenging.
- Amplitude perturbation outcomes are also difficult to compare across various acoustic analysis systems.
- Standardization of voice analysis methods is needed for reliable cross-system comparisons.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by identifying...
Auditory Perception
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Perception of Sound Waves
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same frequency...

