Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

In Vitro Application of a Wireless Sensor in Flexion-Extension Gap Balance of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
07:33

In Vitro Application of a Wireless Sensor in Flexion-Extension Gap Balance of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Published on: May 5, 2023

Robotic arm-assisted UKA improves tibial component alignment: a pilot study.

Jess H Lonner1, Thomas K John, Michael A Conditt

  • 1Booth Bartolozzi Balderston Orthopaedics, Pennsylvania Hospital, 800 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. lonnerj@pahosp.com

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|July 14, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Kneeling After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Resurfacing the Patella Affect the Ability to Kneel?

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

The Impact of Femoral Component Rotation on Patellar Position and Functional Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Variations in Laxity After Total Knee Arthroplasty Do Not Affect Prosthesis-generated Noise.

Orthopedics·2026
Same author

Radiographic Measures of Patellar Tracking After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparing the Native Patellar Midpoint Versus Median Ridge as Reference Landmarks.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Opioid Consumption Trends in Resurfaced versus Unresurfaced Patellae in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

"Neutral Satisfied" Patients Should Not Be Dichotomized to "Satisfied" or "Dissatisfied" in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025

Robotic arm assistance significantly improved tibial component alignment accuracy in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This novel technology reduced bone preparation errors and variance compared to traditional manual instrumentation, potentially enhancing implant outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Biomechanical engineering
  • Medical device technology

Background:

  • Component alignment is crucial for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) success.
  • Robotic arm technology offers potential for enhanced bone preparation accuracy in UKA.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of tibial component bone preparation in UKA using robotic arm assistance versus conventional manual instrumentation.
  • To quantify the differences in radiographic alignment errors and variance between the two techniques.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study involving 31 knees treated with robotic-assisted UKA and 27 knees treated with manual UKA.
  • Postoperative radiographic alignment of the tibial component was assessed against preoperative plans.
  • Key metrics included root mean square error and variance in posterior tibial slope and coronal plane alignment.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

In Vitro Application of a Wireless Sensor in Flexion-Extension Gap Balance of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
07:33

In Vitro Application of a Wireless Sensor in Flexion-Extension Gap Balance of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Published on: May 5, 2023

Main Results:

  • Robotic assistance reduced posterior tibial slope root mean square error from 3.1 to 1.9 degrees.
  • Variance in posterior tibial slope was 2.6 times greater with manual instruments.
  • Coronal plane alignment errors (varus/valgus) were significantly lower with robotic assistance (1.8 degrees RMSE) compared to manual techniques (3.4 degrees RMSE).

Conclusions:

  • Robotic arm-assisted bone preparation demonstrates superior accuracy in achieving planned tibial component alignment for UKA.
  • The reduction in alignment errors and variance warrants further investigation into its impact on UKA function and longevity.