Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms
Published on: December 9, 2015
[Study of variability in response to aspirin and clopidogrel: clinical and/or biological resistance?]
1Service d'hématologie biologique, Hôtel-Dieu, 75004 Paris, France. mmsamama@aol.com
Insights
Millions in France use aspirin and clopidogrel for secondary prevention of thrombotic events. Researchers suggest using "variable platelet response" instead of "resistance" for clarity and potential prognostic insights.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Aspirin and clopidogrel are widely used long-term antiplatelet therapies in France.
- These drugs are crucial for secondary prevention following arterial thrombotic events like myocardial infarction and stroke.
- The concept of 'resistance' to these drugs is often ambiguously defined and applied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the confusion surrounding the term 'resistance' in antiplatelet therapy.
- To advocate for the adoption of 'variable platelet response' as a more accurate and accepted term.
- To explore the clinical relevance of differentiating between true resistance and variable response.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing biological and clinical literature on antiplatelet drug response.
- Discussion of various platelet function tests used to assess treatment impact.
- Consideration of ongoing large-scale prospective studies.
Main Results:
- True pharmacological resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel is considered rare.
- A variable platelet response is a more common phenomenon observed in patients.
- Distinguishing between resistance and variable response may have significant prognostic implications.
Conclusions:
- The term 'variable platelet response' is preferred over 'resistance' for better clarity and acceptance among specialists.
- Platelet function tests are valuable tools for evaluating the biological effects of antiplatelet treatments.
- Further research and results from ongoing studies are necessary to establish clinical guidelines for optimal antiplatelet therapy based on response variability.
Abstract:
Millions of people in France are taking long-term treatments with the two main antiplatelet drugs, aspirin and/or clopidogrel. Most of these people are on a secondary preventive regimen after arterial thrombotic events such as myocardial infarction, stroke, or ischemic complications of lower limb arteriopathy. The term resistance is often a source of confusion. When used, its definition should be explicit. It would be probably be wiser to use a term such as "variable response" which is more widely accepted by specialists and researchers. It would be better to use the term variable platelet response since true pharmacological resistance is rare. The distinction may have clinical pertinence in terms of prognosis. An abundant amount of biological and clinical work in the literature has improved our understanding of the topic. Diverse tests for exploring platelet functions can be used to evaluate the biological impact of treatment. They should, in the near future, contribute to the implementation of guidelines or suggestions for optimal therapeutic modalities. Upcoming results of ongoing large-scale prospective studies will be needed before confirming the potential usefulness and clinical pertinence of these tests.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacogenetic Phenotypes: Alterations in Pharmacokinetics, Drug Targets and Biologic Milieu
Drug toxicity: Idiosyncratic Reactions
Dosage Regimen: Individualization
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Metabolism: Overview
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...