Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Ultra-Fast Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
Are RAS mutations predictive markers of resistance to standard chemotherapy?
Yohann Loriot1, Pierre Mordant, Eric Deutsch
1SITEP, Department of Medicine, University Paris XI, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Abstract:
KRAS mutations may be predictive of resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal-based therapy in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Screening for KRAS mutations in patients with CRC and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may provide additional information on optimizing treatment options with targeted therapies. Only limited studies, however, have assessed the predictive value of KRAS mutations in response to conventional chemotherapy. We reviewed all relevant papers investigating the association of KRAS mutations and conventional chemotherapy-related outcome in NSCLC, CRC, and other solid tumors, both in the adjuvant and advanced settings. Our Review strongly suggests that KRAS mutations have no value in response prediction to conventional chemotherapy in NSCLC, CRC and other solid tumors. Therefore, KRAS mutations should not be used as molecular predictors of response to conventional chemotherapy.
Insights
KRAS mutations do not predict response to conventional chemotherapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These genetic markers should not guide decisions regarding traditional chemotherapy treatments.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Diagnostics
- Cancer Therapeutics
Background:
- KRAS mutations are known predictors of resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in colorectal cancer (CRC).
- Their role in predicting response to conventional chemotherapy across various solid tumors remains less understood.
- Current clinical practice may benefit from clarity on KRAS mutation utility beyond targeted therapy selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively review the existing literature on the association between KRAS mutations and outcomes with conventional chemotherapy.
- To determine if KRAS mutations serve as predictive biomarkers for conventional chemotherapy response in solid tumors.
- To provide evidence-based recommendations on the clinical utility of KRAS mutation testing for chemotherapy selection.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of published studies investigating KRAS mutations and conventional chemotherapy response.
- Inclusion of studies across multiple solid tumor types, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and CRC.
- Analysis of data from both adjuvant and advanced treatment settings.
Main Results:
- The review found no significant evidence supporting KRAS mutations as predictors of response to conventional chemotherapy.
- This lack of predictive value was consistent across NSCLC, CRC, and other solid tumors.
- Findings were observed in both adjuvant and advanced cancer treatment contexts.
Conclusions:
- KRAS mutations are not valuable predictors of response to conventional chemotherapy in NSCLC, CRC, and other solid tumors.
- Clinical decisions regarding conventional chemotherapy should not be based on KRAS mutation status.
- Future research should focus on biomarkers that accurately predict response to conventional chemotherapy.
Related Concept Videos
The Ras Gene
Ras is a superfamily...
The Ras Gene
Ras is a superfamily...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Small GTPases - Ras and Rho
Three regulatory proteins control their activity:
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
Abnormal Proliferation