Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography01:27

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

DefinitionComputed Tomography (CT) of the genitourinary (GU) tract is a non-invasive imaging modality that utilizes X-rays and computer processing to generate detailed cross-sectional images of the urinary system, encompassing the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and adjacent structures such as the adrenal glands.PurposeCT scans of the GU tract serve several diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, including:Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Diseases: Detects kidney stones, tumors, cysts, and congenital...
Computed Tomography01:10

Computed Tomography

Tomography refers to imaging by sections. Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computers to analyze several cross-sectional X-rays to reveal minute details about structures in the body.
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI01:14

Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI

Introduction: MRI and CT scans are crucial advancements in medical imaging techniques, playing a vital role in diagnosing conditions related to the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Each scan serves distinct purposes, targets specific areas, and requires unique nursing duties.
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT01:28

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT

Cardiac computed tomography (CT) scanning is an advanced cardiac imaging technique that utilizes CT technology, with or without intravenous (IV) contrast, to produce accurate cross-sectional virtual slices of specific areas of the heart, coronary circulation, and major blood vessels such as the aorta, pulmonary veins, and arteries. The computer processes these slices to generate three-dimensional images. Multidetector CT (MDCT) is a rapid form of CT scanning that captures multiple slices...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT01:25

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

Calcium-Scoring CT ScanA calcium-scoring CT scan, also known as coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan, detects calcium deposits in the coronary arteries. This test assesses the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), which can lead to cardiovascular events such as angina, heart failure, and sudden cardiac arrest.A calcium-scoring CT scan is generally recommended for individuals at intermediate risk of CAD without symptoms. It includes:Men aged 40-75 and women aged 50-75: Especially those with a...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray01:20

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray

The most common cardiovascular diagnostic test is an X-ray. It produces images of the heart, blood vessels, and adjacent structures.
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

AI for Radiology: A Primer Part II. Interacting with AI Results.

RadiologyĀ·2026
Same author

Radiology Reimagined: Interoperability and Lessons Learned from the Imaging AI in Practice Demonstration.

RadiologyĀ·2026
Same author

Deep learning-derived pericardial adipose tissue by electrocardiogram-gated cardiac computed tomography predicts cardiovascular events beyond coronary calcium score.

American journal of preventive cardiologyĀ·2026
Same author

Enhancing Patient Understanding of Radiology Reports Through Large Language Model-Generated Summaries, Clickable Terms, and Artificial Intelligence Videos.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACRĀ·2026
Same author

Modernization of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Program: Rationale and Overview of the THIS-WIC (Telehealth Intervention Strategies for WIC) Project.

Journal of nutrition education and behaviorĀ·2026
Same author

MRI Deep Learning for Differentiating Glioblastoma, IDH Wild-type from Central Nervous System Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.

Cancer research communicationsĀ·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Image Rendering Techniques in Postmortem Computed Tomography: Evaluation of Biological Health and Profile in Stranded Cetaceans
12:32

Image Rendering Techniques in Postmortem Computed Tomography: Evaluation of Biological Health and Profile in Stranded Cetaceans

Published on: September 27, 2020

A multicenter observer performance study of 3D JPEG2000 compression of thin-slice CT.

Bradley J Erickson1, Elizabeth Krupinski, Katherine P Andriole

  • 1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. bje@mayo.edu

Journal of Digital Imaging
|July 16, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Even mild 3D JPEG2000 compression of CT scans is visually detectable by most observers. Perception of compression artifacts is common, potentially impacting diagnostic decisions in medical imaging.

More Related Videos

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration
05:05

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration

Published on: November 23, 2019

3D Printing of Preclinical X-ray Computed Tomographic Data Sets
11:06

3D Printing of Preclinical X-ray Computed Tomographic Data Sets

Published on: March 22, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Image Rendering Techniques in Postmortem Computed Tomography: Evaluation of Biological Health and Profile in Stranded Cetaceans
12:32

Image Rendering Techniques in Postmortem Computed Tomography: Evaluation of Biological Health and Profile in Stranded Cetaceans

Published on: September 27, 2020

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration
05:05

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration

Published on: November 23, 2019

3D Printing of Preclinical X-ray Computed Tomographic Data Sets
11:06

3D Printing of Preclinical X-ray Computed Tomographic Data Sets

Published on: March 22, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Image Compression

Background:

  • Thin-slice computed tomography (CT) imaging generates large datasets.
  • Efficient storage and transmission of medical imaging data are crucial.
  • Lossy compression techniques like JPEG2000 are explored for medical applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the visual perceptibility threshold of 3D JPEG2000 compression on chest and abdomen-pelvis CT scans.
  • To compare the perception of compression artifacts among experienced radiologists, residents, and non-physician experts.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized multidetector computed tomography 3D datasets with thin slices (0.625-1 mm).
  • Applied JPEG2000 compression at varying bitrates: lossless, 1.5 bits per pixel (bpp) (8:1), 1 bpp (12:1), and 0.75 bpp (16:1).
  • Employed a flicker mode paradigm for observers to compare original and compressed image pairs.

Main Results:

  • A significant majority of observers detected compression artifacts at all tested levels: 77.46% at 8:1, 94.75% at 12:1, and 98.59% at 16:1.
  • No substantial difference in detection rates was observed between staff radiologists (64.70%), residents (71.91%), and PhD experts (69.95%).
  • Mild compression levels were readily perceptible, indicating current technology's sensitivity.

Conclusions:

  • 3D JPEG2000 compression is visually perceptible even at relatively low compression ratios for thin-slice CT.
  • Observer expertise did not significantly alter the ability to detect compression-related visual differences.
  • While detection does not equate to diagnostic impact, the perception of artifacts may influence diagnostic workflow and decision-making.