Cardiovascular monitoring by pulse dye densitometry or arterial indocyanine green dilution
Marije Reekers1, Mischa J G Simon, Fred Boer
1Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. m.reekers@lumc.n
Insights
Pulse dye densitometry (PDD) for noninvasive cardiac output (CO) monitoring showed wide limits of agreement for CO and central blood volume (CBV) compared to invasive methods. This suggests PDD has limited clinical reliability for individual patient cardiovascular assessment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Medical Instrumentation
- Diagnostic Technologies
Background:
- Noninvasive cardiac output (CO) monitoring is crucial for patient management.
- Indocyanine green (ICG) dilution measured by pulse dye densitometry (PDD) offers a noninvasive approach.
- Validation of PDD's precision against invasive methods is necessary.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the precision of PDD for measuring hemodynamic variables.
- To compare CO, central blood volume (CBV), and total blood volume (TBV) derived from PDD with invasive ICG measurements.
- To assess the clinical utility of PDD in individual patients.
Main Methods:
- 36 sessions in 20 patients using PDD (finger and nose probes) after IV ICG administration.
- Simultaneous arterial blood sampling for ICG concentration measurement.
- Comparison of PDD-derived and invasive ICG-derived hemodynamic variables using Bland-Altman analysis.
Main Results:
- PDD with finger probe: CO (LOA -56% to 47%), CBV (LOA -54% to 96%), TBV (LOA -38% to 8%).
- PDD with nose probe: CO (LOA -67% to 127%), CBV (LOA -98% to 193%), TBV (LOA -47% to 27%).
- Both probes showed wide limits of agreement for CO and CBV.
Conclusions:
- Despite acceptable bias, wide LOA indicate PDD is unsuitable for individual CO and CBV evaluation.
- The reliability and clinical use of PDD for cardiovascular variables appear limited.
- Further research may be needed to improve PDD accuracy and precision.
Background:
Noninvasive cardiac output (CO) monitoring is possible by indocyanine green (ICG) dilution measured by pulse dye densitometry (PDD). To validate the precision of this method, we compared hemodynamic variables derived from PDD (DDG-2001, Nihon Kohden, Japan) with those derived from simultaneously taken arterial blood ICG concentrations.
Methods:
In 20 patients (6 M/14 F), ASA I or II, 36 sessions were performed (n = 24 with the PDD-finger probe, n = 10 with the PDD-nose probe). After IV administration of 10 mg ICG, 34 arterial blood samples were taken during each session, with 20 samples taken during the first 2 min. CO, central blood volume (CBV), and total blood volume (TBV) were calculated independently from ICG and PDD and the results compared between methods using Bland-Altman analysis. The results are reported as mean difference (bias) and limits of agreement (LOA = +/- 2 sd).
Results:
PDD using the finger probe underestimated CO (LOA) by 5% (-56% and 47%); overestimated CBV by 21% (-54% and 96%) and underestimated TBV by -15% (-38% and 8%). PDD using the nose probe overestimated CO (LOA) by 30% (-67% and 127%); CBV by 48% (-98% and 193%) and underestimated TBV by -10% (-47% and 27%).
Conclusion:
Despite the permissible bias, the wide LOA of the PDD-derived hemodynamic variables CO and CBV, compared with those simultaneously obtained by invasive arterial ICG measurements, suggest that PDD is unsuitable for evaluation of cardiovascular variables in the individual patient. Hence, the reliability and clinical use of this method seem limited.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiovascular System Abnormal Findings I: Inspection and Palpation
Abnormal findings observed during an inspection
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT


