Related Experiment Videos
Silastic duraplasty in pediatric patients
1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
Neurosurgery
|November 1, 1991
Summary
Nonreinforced Silastic dural grafts, when used with specific surgical techniques, effectively prevent neural tissue retethering after spinal dysraphism surgery. This method shows a low complication rate, avoiding issues like hemorrhage and infection.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Adhesions after spinal dysraphism surgery can cause neural element retethering.
- Silastic has been used for duraplasty, but concerns exist regarding hemorrhage and fibrotic capsule formation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of nonreinforced Silastic dural grafts in preventing neural tissue adherence.
- To present a surgical technique utilizing Silastic grafts for various neurosurgical conditions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 33 patients undergoing neurosurgery with Silastic dural grafts.
- Inclusion of diagnoses: spinal lipomyelomeningoceles, myelomeningoceles, Chiari II malformations, tethered cords, spinal cord tumors, diastematomyelia, and cerebellar astrocytoma.
- Detailed presentation of the surgical technique and patient follow-up up to 6 years.
Main Results:
- No hemorrhages or cerebrospinal fluid leakage observed with nonreinforced Silastic sheeting.
- One infection treated successfully with antibiotics without graft removal.
- A single case of pseudomeningocele noted incidentally on MRI.
- Dacron-reinforced Silastic was associated with a significant fibroblastic response.
Conclusions:
- Nonreinforced Silastic dural grafts are safe and effective in preventing neural tissue retethering.
- Appropriate technical modifications are crucial for successful Silastic graft utilization.
- Dacron-reinforced Silastic may be linked to adverse fibrotic complications.