Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Animal Mitochondrial Genetics

Animal Mitochondrial Genetics

Among all the organelles in an animal cell, only mitochondria have their own independent genomes. Animal mitochondrial DNA is a double-stranded, closed-circular molecule with around 20,000 base pairs. Mitochondrial DNA is unique in that one of its two strands, the heavy, or H, -strand is guanine rich, whereas the complementary strand is cytosine rich and called the light, or L, -strand. Compared to nuclear DNA, mitochondrial DNA has a very low percentage of non-coding regions and is marked by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Quantifying variability of mitochondrial markers in m3243A > G myopathy.

Scientific reports·2025

Same author

Variant load of mitochondrial DNA in single human mesenchymal stem cells.

Scientific reports·2024

Same author

Phase II Feasibility Study of the Efficacy, Tolerability, and Impact on the Gut Microbiome of a Low-Residue (Fiber) Diet in Adult Patients With Mitochondrial Disease.

Gastro hep advances·2024

Same author

Abbreviated Score to Assess Adherence to the 2018 WCRF/AICR Cancer Prevention Recommendations and Risk of Cancer in the UK Biobank.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2023

Same author

Selenium status and its determinants in very old adults: insights from the Newcastle 85+ Study.

The British journal of nutrition·2023

Same author

A novel mouse model of mitochondrial disease exhibits juvenile-onset severe neurological impairment due to parvalbumin cell mitochondrial dysfunction.

Communications biology·2023

Same journal

Metabolic Kinases as Regulators of Inter-Organelle Communication in Aging and Age-Related Diseases.

Aging cell·2026

Same journal

A Non-Canonical Role for Hepatocyte MLKL in Promoting Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Senescence in the Aging Liver.

Aging cell·2026

Same journal

EGR1 Mediates Ursodeoxycholic Acid-Promoted Mitophagy to Prevent Postovulatory Aging of Porcine Oocytes.

Aging cell·2026

Same journal

Interplay of the ENS and Microbiota With Murine Gut Epithelium-Derived Organoids in Aging.

Aging cell·2026

Same journal

Age-Associated Senescence of Decidual Macrophages: A Key Mediator of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Advanced Maternal Age.

Aging cell·2026

Same journal

Correction to "Telomerase Knockout in Myeloid Cells Predisposes Mice to Foam Cell Formation, Dyslipidemia, Lung Fibrosis, and Cardiac Dysfunction".

Aging cell·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

High-Throughput Image-Based Quantification of Mitochondrial DNA Synthesis and Distribution

High-Throughput Image-Based Quantification of Mitochondrial DNA Synthesis and Distribution

Published on: May 5, 2023

Quantification of mitochondrial DNA mutation load.

Laura C Greaves¹, Nina E Beadle, Geoffrey A Taylor

¹Mitochondrial Research Group, Institute for Ageing and Health, Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK. l.c.greaves@ncl.ac.uk

|July 24, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Quantifying mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations in aging tissues is challenging. This study compares three common methods, revealing significant variations in mutation load measurements from human colon biopsies.

More Related Videos

Measuring Single-Cell Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number and Heteroplasmy Using Digital Droplet Polymerase Chain Reaction

Measuring Single-Cell Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number and Heteroplasmy Using Digital Droplet Polymerase Chain Reaction

Published on: July 12, 2022

Genotyping Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Mitochondrial Genome by Pyrosequencing

Genotyping Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Mitochondrial Genome by Pyrosequencing

Published on: February 10, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

High-Throughput Image-Based Quantification of Mitochondrial DNA Synthesis and Distribution

High-Throughput Image-Based Quantification of Mitochondrial DNA Synthesis and Distribution

Published on: May 5, 2023

Measuring Single-Cell Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number and Heteroplasmy Using Digital Droplet Polymerase Chain Reaction

Measuring Single-Cell Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number and Heteroplasmy Using Digital Droplet Polymerase Chain Reaction

Published on: July 12, 2022

Genotyping Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Mitochondrial Genome by Pyrosequencing

Genotyping Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Mitochondrial Genome by Pyrosequencing

Published on: February 10, 2023

Area of Science:

Genetics
Molecular Biology
Gerontology

Background:

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations are linked to genetic diseases and aging.
Accurate quantification of mtDNA mutation load in aging tissues is difficult due to low mutation incidence.
Existing methods like post-PCR cloning, single-molecule PCR, and random mutation capture yield disparate results.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the procedures and practicalities of three common mtDNA mutation detection assays.
To assess the variability in mtDNA mutation load quantification using different techniques.
To investigate mutation loads in colonic mucosal biopsies from human subjects.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of post-PCR cloning, single-molecule PCR, and random mutation capture assays.
Application of these assays to colonic mucosal biopsies from ten human subjects.
Evaluation of assay sensitivity, practicality, and resulting mutation load data.

Main Results:

Significant variations in mtDNA mutation load were observed across the three techniques.
Direct comparison on the same human tissue highlighted discrepancies in reported mutation frequencies.
The study assessed the operational aspects and outcomes of each assay.

Conclusions:

The choice of method significantly impacts the quantification of mtDNA mutation load in aging tissues.
Further standardization or understanding of assay-specific biases is needed for reliable aging research.
This comparative analysis provides insights into the practical application of different mtDNA mutation detection techniques.