[Operating and recovery time in children with humeral fracture]

Irving Quezada-Daniel1, Armando Pérez-Solares

  • 1Hospital Regional "General Ignacio Zaragoza," Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado, Distrito Federal, México, Mexico. drqueza@hotmail.com

Insights

Closed reduction for pediatric humeral fractures is faster and leads to better range of motion compared to open reduction. This study highlights advantages of closed reduction for pediatric humeral fracture (HF) treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Orthopedics
  • Traumatology
  • Surgical Techniques

Background:

  • Pediatric humeral fractures (HF) require specialized management for optimal reduction, fixation, and complication prevention.
  • Assessing treatment advantages and disadvantages concerning operative time and recovery is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the advantages and disadvantages of open reduction and internal fixation versus closed reduction and pegging for pediatric humeral fractures.
  • To evaluate the impact of surgical approach on operating time and post-surgical recovery.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective, comparative study reviewed 108 pediatric patients with Holmberg type II and III humeral fractures.
  • Patients were divided into two groups: open reduction with internal fixation and closed reduction with pegging.

Main Results:

  • Average operative time was significantly shorter for closed reduction (30.8 minutes) compared to open reduction (60.3 minutes) (p < 0.01).
  • Both groups had a 4-week recovery period, but closed reduction resulted in significantly better flexion (38.7 degrees) than open reduction (13.6 degrees).

Conclusions:

  • Closed reduction demonstrated a shorter surgical time.
  • Closed reduction led to superior clinical recovery, evidenced by greater flexion at four weeks post-surgery.
Abstract