Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

09:49
Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
Published on: April 16, 2014
The Anderson-Winawer illusion: it's not occlusion
1Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. frederic.poirier@umontreal.ca
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|July 28, 2009
Summary
A lightness illusion causes identical textures to appear black or white. Occlusion-based theories fail to explain this, as demonstrated by new modeling and psychophysical data.
Area of Science:
- Visual perception
- Computational neuroscience
- Psychophysics
Background:
- Anderson and Winawer (2005) demonstrated a striking lightness illusion where identical textures are perceived as black or white.
- Albert (2007) proposed an occlusion-based theory to explain this illusion by inferring surface depth and visibility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the validity of Albert's (2007) occlusion-based theory for the Anderson and Winawer (2005) lightness illusion.
- To propose an alternative explanation for the observed lightness effects.
Main Methods:
- Utilized computational modeling to simulate visual scene interpretation.
- Employed psychophysical experiments to gather human perception data.
- Manipulated figure contrast levels within the range tested by Anderson and Winawer (2005).
Main Results:
- Modifications based on Albert's (2007) theory reversed the illusion, contrary to the original findings.
- This reversal occurred within the lower figure-contrast range investigated.
- Occlusion-based theories were found insufficient to account for the Anderson and Winawer (2005) data.
Conclusions:
- Albert's (2007) occlusion-based theory cannot explain the Anderson and Winawer (2005) lightness illusion.
- A novel scene-interpretation strategy is proposed to account for the illusion's effects, particularly at lower contrasts.
Related Concept Videos
Perceptual Constancy
Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Visual Agnosia
Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round end"...
Gestalt Principles of Perception
Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
Nonconscious Mimicry
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
Hindsight Biases
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Cause and Effect
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

