Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026
10:09
Adjustable Stiffness, External Fixator for the Rat Femur Osteotomy and Segmental Bone Defect Models
Published on: October 9, 2014
The use of a biplanar construct in pelvic external fixation
Mitsuaki Noda1, Takayoshi Yamakawa, Tsuyoshi Fujii
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konan Hospital, 1-5-16 Kamokogahara Higahinada Kobe, 658-0064 Japan.
Orthopedics
|July 29, 2009
Summary
Biplanar pelvic constructs offer superior stability for pelvic ring fractures compared to uniplanar methods. This enhanced stability may reduce complications like infection and pin loosening in long-term treatment.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Trauma care
- Biomechanical engineering
Background:
- Pelvic ring fractures require stabilization.
- Current uniplanar pin fixation can lead to infection and instability.
- Biplanar constructs are hypothesized to offer improved stability.
Observation:
- Two patients with pelvic ring fractures were treated using biplanar fixation.
- Pins were inserted at the supra-acetabulum and iliac crest.
- Patients experienced significant pain relief postoperatively.
Findings:
- Biplanar pelvic constructs demonstrated sufficient stability during treatment and follow-up.
- No critical pin-site infections occurred despite prolonged pin application.
- The stability of the biplanar construct appeared to minimize pin-site infections.
Implications:
- Biplanar fixation may be a more stable and safer long-term solution for pelvic ring fractures.
- This technique could reduce the incidence of complications associated with pelvic external fixation.
- Further research into biplanar constructs for pelvic fracture management is warranted.
