Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Frequency and severity of harm of medication errors related to the parenteral nutrition process in a large university
Gordon S Sacks1, Steve Rough, Kenneth A Kudsk
1Division of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. gss0005@auburn.edu
Study Objective:
To determine the frequency of medication errors, as well as the severity of harm resulting from these errors, related to the prescription, transcription, preparation, and administration of parenteral nutrition formulations.
Design:
Prospective, observational study.
Setting:
471-bed, academic teaching hospital.
Patients:
All adult and pediatric inpatients receiving parenteral nutrition between November 1, 2002 and May 31, 2004.
Measurements And Main Results:
The occurrence of incorrect prescribing practices, wrong formulation preparation, operational system errors, order entry errors related to automated technology, and incorrect administration practices were documented. In addition, the specific step in the drug process--prescription, transcription, preparation, and administration--at the time that the error occurred was noted. Harm scores, to assess the severity of the error in relation to the safety of the patient, were assigned based on the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP). The rate of errors with parenteral nutrition was then compared with the rate of errors with other high-alert drugs, both at our institution and at a health care consortium. A total of 4730 prescriptions for parenteral nutrition were written during the study period; 74 (1.6%) were associated with a medication error. Of these errors, 1 (1%) occurred during the prescription process (and was detected before preparation), 29 (39%) occurred during the transcription process, 18 (24%) during preparation, and 26 (35%) during the administration process. Sixty-seven (91%) of the 74 errors were considered nonharmful, as defined by NCC MERP, whereas 6 (8%) contributed to or resulted in temporary harm to a patient. The rate of errors was similar between our institution and the consortium, both for parenteral nutrition formulations and for other high-alert drugs. The overall incidence of medication errors during the study was 15.6 errors/1000 parenteral nutrition prescriptions compounded.
Conclusion:
Our results demonstrate that medication errors related to the prescription, transcription, preparation, and administration of parenteral nutrition formulations occur and occasionally result in harm. Health care institutions should develop quality assurance programs to document compliance with published safe practice guidelines for parenteral nutrition.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
