Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

13:19
Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
Published on: November 2, 2013
A stochastic model for identifying differential gene pair co-expression patterns in prostate cancer progression
Wen Juan Mo1, Xu Ping Fu, Xiao Tian Han
1State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Institute of Genetics, School of Life Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, PR China. 041019012@fudan.edu.cn
BMC Genomics
|July 31, 2009
Summary
A new method, the Stochastic process model for Identifying differentially co-expressed Gene pairs (SIG method), effectively identifies gene pairs linked to cancer progression. This aids in understanding cancer mechanisms and developing targeted therapies.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Bioinformatics
- Cancer Research
Background:
- Identifying gene co-expression patterns across cancer stages is crucial for understanding carcinogenesis.
- Existing methods lack statistical rigor for assessing gene co-expression changes during cancer progression.
- A specific algorithm is needed to pinpoint gene pairs correlated with cancer advancement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a novel analytical method for identifying differentially co-expressed gene pairs during cancer progression.
- To assess the correlation of identified gene pairs with cancer progression and their enrichment in disease-specific pathways.
Main Methods:
- Developed the Stochastic process model for Identifying differentially co-expressed Gene pairs (SIG method).
- Applied the SIG method to prostate cancer datasets (hormone sensitive vs. resistant, healthy vs. cancerous).
- Compared SIG method results with existing statistical methods using progression analysis, gene pair identification effectiveness, and pathway enrichment analysis.
Main Results:
- The SIG method identified 428,582 and 303,992 gene pairs in the two prostate cancer datasets, respectively.
- Gene pairs identified by SIG demonstrated high correlation with cancer progression (large PS, TPR) and pathway enrichment (large PES).
- SIG method outperformed existing methods in progression analysis (small RS) and pathway enrichment.
Conclusions:
- The SIG method reliably identifies cancer progression-correlated gene pairs.
- The SIG method excels in gene pair ontology and pathway enrichment analyses.
- This approach offers an effective means to understand carcinogenesis by tracking cancer progression.
