Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Design to Implementation Study for Development and Patient Validation of Paper-Based Toehold Switch Diagnostics
Published on: June 17, 2022
Design, implementation and results of the quality control program for the Australian government's point of care
Mark Shephard1, Anne Shephard, Les Watkinson
1Community Point-of-Care Services, Flinders University Rural Clinical School, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. mark.shephard@flinders.edu.au
Insights
Quality control testing in a general practice trial demonstrated that point-of-care testing (PoCT) met analytical goals. Most devices performed well, with high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) being the main exception.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Health Services Research
- Quality Management
Background:
- A 2005-2007 Australian Government trial evaluated point-of-care testing (PoCT) in general practice (GP).
- PoCT devices measured haemoglobin A1c, urine albumin:creatinine ratio, lipids, and international normalized ratio.
- The trial assessed clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, satisfaction, and safety of PoCT in primary care settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish and implement an internal quality control (QC) program for the general practice PoCT trial.
- To assess the within-practice imprecision of PoCT devices used in the trial.
- To compare observed QC performance against pre-defined analytical goals for imprecision.
Main Methods:
- Developed an internal quality control (QC) program within a quality management framework.
- Provided PoCT operators with color-coded QC Result and Action Sheets for on-site data recording and interpretation.
- Calculated median within-practice imprecision for QC testing and compared it to analytical goals.
Main Results:
- Achieved an average QC testing participation rate of 91% or higher.
- Median within-practice imprecision met analytical goals for most PoC tests.
- High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) testing showed performance outside minimum goals for one level and lot number of QC.
Conclusions:
- Internal QC testing indicated that PoCT in the general practice trial generally met analytical goals.
- The primary exception to meeting analytical goals was observed with high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) testing.
- The quality management framework and QC program supported the assessment of PoCT performance in primary care.
Background:
From 2005 to 2007 the Australian Government funded a multicentre, clustered randomized controlled trial to determine the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, satisfaction and safety of point of care testing (PoCT) in general practice (GP). PoC tests measured (and devices used) in the trial were haemoglobin A1c and urine albumin:creatinine ratio (DCA 2000), lipids (Cholestech LDX) and international normalized ratio (CoaguChek S).
Methods:
An internal quality control (QC) program was developed as part of a quality management framework for the trial. PoCT device operators were provided with a colour-coded QC Result Sheet and QC Action Sheet for on-site recording and interpreting of their results. Within-practice imprecision for QC testing was calculated and compared with the analytical goals for imprecision set prior to the trial.
Results:
The average participation rate for QC testing was 91% or greater. Median within-practice imprecision met the analytical goals for all PoC tests, except for high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) where observed performance was outside the minimum goal for one level and one lot number of QC. Most practices achieved the imprecision goals for all analytes, with the principal exception of HDL-C.
Conclusions:
Results from QC testing indicate that PoCT in the GP trial met the analytical goals set for the trial, with the exception of HDL-C.
Related Concept Videos
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Quality Assurance
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...