Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
Published on: February 5, 2014
Parsimony score of phylogenetic networks: hardness results and a linear-time heuristic
Guohua Jin1, Luay Nakhleh, Sagi Snir
1Department of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA. jin@cs.rice.edu
Abstract:
Phylogenies-the evolutionary histories of groups of organisms-play a major role in representing the interrelationships among biological entities. Many methods for reconstructing and studying such phylogenies have been proposed, almost all of which assume that the underlying history of a given set of species can be represented by a binary tree. Although many biological processes can be effectively modeled and summarized in this fashion, others cannot: recombination, hybrid speciation, and horizontal gene transfer result in networks of relationships rather than trees of relationships. In previous works, we formulated a maximum parsimony (MP) criterion for reconstructing and evaluating phylogenetic networks, and demonstrated its quality on biological as well as synthetic data sets. In this paper, we provide further theoretical results as well as a very fast heuristic algorithm for the MP criterion of phylogenetic networks. In particular, we provide a novel combinatorial definition of phylogenetic networks in terms of "forbidden cycles," and provide detailed hardness and hardness of approximation proofs for the "small" MP problem. We demonstrate the performance of our heuristic in terms of time and accuracy on both biological and synthetic data sets. Finally, we explain the difference between our model and a similar one formulated by Nguyen et al., and describe the implications of this difference on the hardness and approximation results.
Related Concept Videos
Microbial Phylogeny
Phylogenetic Trees
Phylogenetic Trees
Phylogeny
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...

