Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic01:21

Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic

The correlation between a drug's dosage and its impact on a biological system is a cornerstone of pharmacology and toxicology. Conventional dose–response curves, which include graded and quantal relationships, are key to this understanding. Graded dose–response curves depict the spectrum of a biological reaction to different doses within an individual, indicating that as the drug dosage increases, so does the intensity of the response. On the other hand, quantal dose–response relationships...
Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions01:24

Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions

Drug toxicities can be stratified into pharmacological, pathological, or genotoxic based on their mechanisms. The incidence and severity of these toxicities generally increase with the drug's concentration in the body and exposure time.Pharmacological toxicity is evident when the therapeutic effects of drugs overshoot into adverse reactions in a predictable, dose-dependent manner. Central nervous system (CNS) depression from barbiturates is a classic example, with effects escalating from...
Dosage Regimen: Individualization01:24

Dosage Regimen: Individualization

Individualization in dosing regimens is the customization of medication doses for individual patients. Its necessity arises from the goal of maximizing therapeutic benefits while minimizing risks. This approach is pivotal because human responses to drugs can vary widely; what is effective for one person may be inadequate or excessive for another. Interpatient (intersubject) variability refers to differences in drug responses between individuals, while intrapatient (intrasubject) variability...
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors01:24

Drug Toxicity: Risk factors

Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) are potential complications that arise during pharmacotherapy, influenced by multiple risk factors. Age plays a significant role; both neonates and the elderly are at heightened risk due to their respective immature and diminished metabolic and elimination processes. Gender also impacts ADRs, with females experiencing a 1.5 to 1.7-fold greater risk than males, which may be linked to pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and hormonal differences. Notably, neonates, the...
Drug toxicity: Idiosyncratic Reactions01:16

Drug toxicity: Idiosyncratic Reactions

Idiosyncratic drug reactions represent abnormal chemical responses that vary significantly among individuals, ranging from extreme sensitivity to low doses to insensitivity to high doses. These reactions often occur due to the drug's covalent binding with serum proteins, forming a foreign hapten that triggers an immunotoxicological response. The variability in drug reactions has a strong pharmacogenetic foundation, with genetic differences crucial in how individuals metabolize drugs. For...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reciprocal Relationships Between Perceived Teachers' Moral Grandstanding, Self-Esteem, and Rumination Among Chinese Primary School Students: An RI-CLPM Study.

Journal of youth and adolescence·2026
Same author

Screening for Distress and Sources of Distress in Parents with Advanced Cancer and their Coparents.

Journal of pain and symptom management·2026
Same author

Lifestyle Program for Breast Cancer Improves Body Composition, Fitness, and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Cancers·2026
Same author

A Virtual, Group-Based Expressive Writing Intervention for Survivors of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer: Protocol for a Single-Arm Feasibility Study.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

Clinical outcomes and spatial transcriptomic profiles of CD19/20 CAR-T therapy in relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer·2026
Same author

Yoga for Patients Undergoing Thoracic Radiotherapy and Their Family Caregivers: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

JCO oncology practice·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC)
11:38

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC)

Published on: May 10, 2016

Risk-group-specific dose finding based on an average toxicity score.

B Nebiyou Bekele1, Yisheng Li, Yuan Ji

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Division of Quantitative Sciences, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. bbekele@mdanderson.org

Biometrics
|August 4, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel Bayesian dose-finding design for clinical trials, improving safety by considering toxicity severity and patient susceptibility. The method enhances dose selection for new cancer therapies.

More Related Videos

Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for the Quantitative Assessment of Acute Ionizing Radiation Induced Skin Toxicity Using a Mouse Model
06:21

Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for the Quantitative Assessment of Acute Ionizing Radiation Induced Skin Toxicity Using a Mouse Model

Published on: May 27, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC)
11:38

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC)

Published on: May 10, 2016

Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for the Quantitative Assessment of Acute Ionizing Radiation Induced Skin Toxicity Using a Mouse Model
06:21

Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for the Quantitative Assessment of Acute Ionizing Radiation Induced Skin Toxicity Using a Mouse Model

Published on: May 27, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Optimizing drug dosage is crucial for maximizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity in clinical trials.
  • Existing dose-finding methods often do not fully account for varying toxicity severities or patient-specific susceptibility.
  • Heterogeneity in patient response necessitates adaptive trial designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a Bayesian dose-finding design that integrates toxicity severity and patient heterogeneity.
  • To establish a robust framework for characterizing overall toxicity using an average toxicity score (ATS).
  • To improve the precision and safety of dose escalation in early-phase clinical trials.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Bayesian approach with a multinomial likelihood and Dirichlet prior to model toxicity scores.
  • Defined severity scores for different toxicity levels.
  • Incorporated patient risk stratification and Bayesian isotonic transformation for order-restricted inference on ATS.
  • Simulated trial performance for a multiple myeloma study.

Main Results:

  • The proposed design effectively models dose-dependent toxicity with varying severity.
  • Accounting for patient heterogeneity improved the accuracy of dose selection.
  • Simulations demonstrated the design's feasibility and performance in a realistic clinical trial setting.

Conclusions:

  • The novel Bayesian design offers a more refined approach to dose-finding by considering toxicity severity and patient susceptibility.
  • This method can lead to safer and more efficient dose selection in oncology drug development.
  • The framework provides a valuable tool for adaptive clinical trial design.