Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
Systematic error arising from 'sequential' standard addition calibrations. 2. Determination of analyte mass fraction
1Analytical Science Team, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LW, UK. richard.brown@npl.co.uk
Abstract:
The use of a sequential standard addition calibration (S-SAC) can introduce systematic errors into measurements results. Whilst this error for the determination of blank-corrected solutions has previously been described, no similar treatment has been available for the quantification of analyte mass fraction in blank solutions--a crucial first step in any analytical procedure. This paper presents the theory describing the measurement of blank solutions using S-SAC, derives the correction that needs to be applied following analysis, and demonstrates the systematic error that occurs if this correction is not applied. The relative magnitudes of this bias and the precision of extrapolated measurements values are also considered.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Blank Solutions
In some experimental cases, the reagents, solvents, or lab equipment used in...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Random and Systematic Errors
Random and Systematic Errors
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

