Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Comparison of Kinetic Characteristics of Footwork during Stroke in Table Tennis: Cross-Step and Chasse Step
Published on: June 16, 2021
Intrateam communication and performance in doubles tennis
Domagoj Lausic1, Gershon Tennebaum, David Eccles
1College of Education, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA. dlausic@hotmail.com
Winning tennis teams communicate more frequently and with greater consistency than losing teams. This enhanced team communication, particularly emotional and action-based exchanges, is key to success in doubles tennis.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Communication Studies
- Psychology
Background:
- Effective communication is crucial for team performance in sports.
- Direct measurement of communication in sports research remains limited.
- Understanding team dynamics in doubles tennis requires analyzing player interactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate communication patterns in NCAA Division I female tennis doubles teams.
- To compare communication sequences between winning and losing teams.
- To identify the role of communication in team success.
Main Methods:
- Utilized video and audio recordings of doubles tennis matches.
- Coded communication instances occurring between and during points.
- Employed sequential analysis with the Discussion Analysis Tool software.
Main Results:
- Over 50% of communications were emotional statements; over 25% were action statements.
- Winning teams displayed significantly different communication sequences compared to losing teams.
- Winning teams exhibited more homogeneous communication patterns and exchanged twice as many messages.
Conclusions:
- Communication homogeneity may enhance message reliability in successful teams.
- Increased communication frequency and consistency are linked to winning in doubles tennis.
- Direct communication analysis offers valuable insights into team dynamics and performance.
Related Concept Videos
Social Facilitation
Robbers Cave
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Competition
Levels of Communication I: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Small Group
We can participate in these relationships through verbal, nonverbal, and mediated communication. We engage in verbal communication when we use words during our interaction to convey specific meanings. On the other hand, nonverbal communication refers to various factors that can impact how we understand each other—for example, facial expressions.
We interact with others using mediated technologies like the...
Force and Momentum