Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy
Published on: November 3, 2016
Acquired microcephaly: causes, patterns, motor and IQ effects, and associated growth changes
Peter Stuart Baxter1, Alan Steven Rigby, Marianne Hélène Elise Pascale Dominique Rotsaert
1Department of Pediatric Neurology, Sheffield Children's National Health Service Foundation Trust, Sheffield, England. peter.baxter@sch.nhs.uk
Insights
This study classified causes and growth patterns of acquired microcephaly in children. Neither the cause nor the growth pattern predicted developmental outcomes, but poor weight and body growth were associated.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurology
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Medical Genetics
Background:
- Acquired microcephaly, characterized by a head circumference falling below the second percentile, requires understanding of its causes and growth trajectories.
- Identifying distinct growth patterns and etiological categories is crucial for managing children with progressive microcephaly.
- Hypothesized correlations between the etiology, growth patterns, and neurodevelopmental outcomes (developmental quotient/IQ) warrant investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To classify the causes and head growth patterns of acquired microcephaly.
- To explore potential correlations between these classifications and developmental quotient/IQ.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of medical records and growth charts for 51 children (0.7–11.3 years) with acquired microcephaly.
- Classification of head growth into four patterns (A, B, C, D) based on occipitofrontal circumference changes relative to the second percentile.
- Formal developmental quotient/IQ assessments were conducted for 34 children.
Main Results:
- Causes were categorized into idiopathic, familial, syndromic, symptomatic, and mixed groups.
- Four head growth patterns were identified, including initial decrease followed by parallel growth, continued decrease, and partial recovery.
- No correlation was found between the causal group and the head growth pattern. Lower head circumference z-scores correlated with lower weight and length z-scores.
- Developmental quotient/IQ scores were generally below 100 and did not correlate with head circumference z-score, cause, or growth pattern.
Conclusions:
- Established classifications for causal groups and growth patterns in acquired microcephaly can assist clinical management.
- Neither the identified causes nor the growth patterns served as predictors of developmental outcomes.
- The observed associations between microcephaly, poor weight gain, and diminished body growth require further research.
Objectives:
The goals were to identify and to classify causes and growth patterns of acquired (or progressive) microcephaly and to look for hypothesized correlations between causes, growth patterns, and developmental quotient/IQ.
Methods:
Fifty-one children (24 boys), 0.7 to 11.3 years of age, with early occipitofrontal circumference measurements above and later ones below the second percentile (SD: -2.03) were studied through retrospective note and growth chart review, with formal assessments of developmental quotient or IQ (n = 34).
Results:
Causes were classifiable into 5 groups as follows: idiopathic, familial, syndromic, symptomatic, and mixed. Four patterns of head growth were identified, as follows: type A, initial decrease from the normal range to below the second percentile, followed by growth below and parallel to the second percentile; type B, continued decrease away from the second percentile; type C, decrease below the normal range, with partial later recovery; type D, insufficient data. For 12 children, there were accompanying decreases in weight percentiles and for 5 of these in height percentiles as well. Infants with lower head circumference z scores at the end of the study also had lower z scores for final weight and final length. There was no correlation between causal group and growth pattern. Developmental quotient/IQ values were mostly <100 and did not correlate with head circumference z score, cause, or pattern.
Conclusions:
The classification of causal groups and growth patterns should aid clinical management. Neither cause nor pattern predicted outcomes. The associations with poor weight gain and body growth deserve further study.
Related Concept Videos
Intellectual Disability
Encephalitis l: Introduction
Biological Influences on Intelligence
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
