Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
The DO difference: an analysis of causal relationships affecting the degree-change debate
Benjamin R Bates1, Joseph P Mazer, Andrew M Ledbetter
1School of Communication Studies at Ohio University in Athens, OH 45701-2819, USA. jm161106@ohio.edu
Osteopathic medical students with lower knowledge of osteopathic principles and practice (OPP) are more likely to favor changing the doctor of osteopathy (DO) degree. Improved OPP awareness is key to preserving the DO difference.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Professional Identity
- Osteopathic Medicine
Background:
- The doctor of osteopathy (DO) degree faces low public recognition, prompting debate on name changes.
- This scrutiny is linked to reduced emphasis on palpation and osteopathic manipulative treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate factors influencing osteopathic medical students' desire to change or retain the DO degree designation.
- Examine the connection between knowledge, attitudes, and intentions regarding the "DO difference."
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional electronic survey assessed 214 osteopathic medical students in the Midwestern US.
- The survey measured knowledge of osteopathic principles and practice (OPP), attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and intention to support degree change.
Main Results:
- Lower OPP knowledge correlated with positive attitudes favoring a degree change; higher knowledge correlated with opposition.
- Attitudes best predicted intention to vote (85% variance), while perceived behavioral control best predicted intention to debate (38% variance).
Conclusions:
- Diminished use of historic professional markers impacts the DO degree's perceived value.
- Enhancing student awareness of OPP is crucial for maintaining the DO difference in practice and degree designation.
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Significance
Causality in Epidemiology
Two-Way ANOVA
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the means for...
Correlation and Causation
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Cause and Effect