Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Hall Effect01:30

The Hall Effect

Edwin H. Hall, in the year 1879, devised an experiment that could be used to identify the polarity of the predominant charge carriers in a conducting material. From a historical perspective, this experiment was the first to demonstrate that the charge carriers in most metals are negative.
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The agreement between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings in temporomandibular joint disorders.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2020
Same author

Junctionless versus inversion-mode lateral semiconductor nanowire transistors.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2018
Same author

Benchmarking of software tools for the characterization of nanoparticles.

Optics express·2017
Same author

Disrupting the wall accumulation of human sperm cells by artificial corrugation.

Biomicrofluidics·2015
Same author

Nonlinear superchiral meta-surfaces: tuning chirality and disentangling non-reciprocity at the nanoscale.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2014
Same author

Geometrical guidance and trapping transition of human sperm cells.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector
06:05

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector

Published on: March 24, 2023

Size dependence of microscopic Hall sensor detection limits.

K Vervaeke1, E Simoen, G Borghs

  • 1Interuniversity Microelectronics Center (IMEC vzw), Kapeldreef 75, Leuven B-3001, Belgium.

The Review of Scientific Instruments
|August 7, 2009
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how the size of microscopic Hall sensors affects their magnetic field detection limits. Sensor size significantly impacts detection at room temperature but not at low temperatures, explained by semiconductor noise theory.

More Related Videos

High-Speed Magnetic Tweezers for Nanomechanical Measurements on Force-Sensitive Elements
08:50

High-Speed Magnetic Tweezers for Nanomechanical Measurements on Force-Sensitive Elements

Published on: May 12, 2023

Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection
16:11

Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection

Published on: April 26, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector
06:05

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector

Published on: March 24, 2023

High-Speed Magnetic Tweezers for Nanomechanical Measurements on Force-Sensitive Elements
08:50

High-Speed Magnetic Tweezers for Nanomechanical Measurements on Force-Sensitive Elements

Published on: May 12, 2023

Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection
16:11

Implementation of a Reference Interferometer for Nanodetection

Published on: April 26, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Solid State Physics
  • Semiconductor Device Physics
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Microscopic Hall sensors are crucial for magnetic field detection.
  • Understanding factors influencing their detection limits is essential for device optimization.
  • Previous research has explored various aspects of Hall sensor performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the magnetic field detection limits of microscopic Hall sensors.
  • To determine the influence of sensor lateral size on detection limits.
  • To analyze the temperature-dependent behavior of these limits.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental investigation of Hall sensors fabricated from GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructures and silicon.
  • Utilizing Hall effect measurements to assess sensor performance.
  • Employing noise spectrum measurements to analyze signal-to-noise ratios.

Main Results:

  • A clear size dependence of the magnetic field detection limit was observed at room temperature.
  • This size dependence disappeared at low temperatures.
  • Experimental data aligns with theoretical predictions from the theory of noise in semiconductors.

Conclusions:

  • The lateral size of microscopic Hall sensors significantly affects their magnetic field detection limits, particularly at room temperature.
  • Temperature plays a critical role in modulating the size-dependent performance of these sensors.
  • The findings provide valuable insights into optimizing Hall sensor design and operation based on semiconductor noise characteristics.