Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...
Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unlocking a flexible set of phylogenetic models for discrete and continuous trait evolution using discretized stochastic diffusion.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Copy-cat evolution: Divergence and convergence within and between cat and dog breeds.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Testing for heterogeneous rates of discrete character evolution on phylogenies.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2024
Same author

phytools 2.0: an updated R ecosystem for phylogenetic comparative methods (and other things).

PeerJ·2024
Same author

The Difficulty of Predicting Evolutionary Change in Response to Novel Ecological Interactions: A Field Experiment with <i>Anolis</i> Lizards.

The American naturalist·2023
Same author

Genome-wide parallelism underlies contemporary adaptation in urban lizards.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus
09:26

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

Size-correction and principal components for interspecific comparative studies.

Liam J Revell1

  • 1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA. lrevell@nescent.org

Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution
|August 12, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Phylogenetic analyses require accounting for evolutionary relationships. Preliminary data transformations, like size-correction and principal component analysis (PCA), must incorporate phylogenetic non-independence to prevent statistical errors and spurious evolutionary conclusions.

More Related Videos

Morphometric Analyses of Shape: The Analysis Software Toolbox for Craniofacial Shape Quantification in Zebrafish
09:03

Morphometric Analyses of Shape: The Analysis Software Toolbox for Craniofacial Shape Quantification in Zebrafish

Published on: February 27, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus
09:26

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

Morphometric Analyses of Shape: The Analysis Software Toolbox for Craniofacial Shape Quantification in Zebrafish
09:03

Morphometric Analyses of Shape: The Analysis Software Toolbox for Craniofacial Shape Quantification in Zebrafish

Published on: February 27, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Comparative genomics
  • Phylogenetics

Background:

  • Phylogenetic methods are crucial for analyzing species data in evolutionary studies.
  • Preliminary data transformations (e.g., size-correction, PCA) are common but often ignore phylogenetic non-independence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide statistically correct procedures for phylogenetic size-correction and PCA.
  • To demonstrate the impact of ignoring phylogeny in preliminary data transformations.

Main Methods:

  • Overview of statistically sound methods for phylogenetic size-correction.
  • Explanation of phylogenetic principal components analysis (PCA).
  • Illustrative R and MATLAB code provided.

Main Results:

  • Ignoring phylogeny during preliminary transformations inflates variance.
  • Non-phylogenetic corrections increase Type I error rates in statistical estimators.
  • Subsequent phylogenetic analyses on uncorrected data can yield spurious results.

Conclusions:

  • Phylogenetic non-independence must be addressed during preliminary data transformations.
  • Failure to do so can lead to unreliable conclusions in evolutionary studies.
  • Corrected methods ensure the validity of phylogenetic statistical analyses.