Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

Language is a system of communication that allows the expression of thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The brain processes language in both hemispheres.
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...

Language and Cognition

Language and Cognition

Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.

Structuralism

Structuralism

Structuralism, an early psychological theory developed by Wilhelm Wundt and his student Edward Bradford Titchener, sought to dissect the human mind into its most fundamental components. Wundt's groundbreaking work in his laboratory set the stage for Titchener to define structuralism's goal as cataloging the "atoms" of the mind—sensations, images, and feelings—akin to how chemists identify elements of matter.
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Grammar acquisition in preschool children is related to white matter maturation of the dorsal language network.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2026

Same author

The coming decade of digital brain research: A vision for neuroscience at the intersection of technology and computing.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025

Same author

Assessing quantitative MRI techniques using multimodal comparisons.

PloS one·2025

Same author

Versatile use of chimpanzee call combinations promotes meaning expansion.

Science advances·2025

Same author

Characterizing Directional Dynamics of Semantic Prediction Based on Inter-regional Temporal Generalization.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025

Same author

Functional and structural brain asymmetries in language processing.

Handbook of clinical neurology·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Neural correlates of morphosyntactic and verb-argument structure processing: an EfMRI study.

Tim Raettig¹, Stefan Frisch, Angela D Friederici

¹Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany. raettig@cbs.mpg.de

Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior

|August 12, 2009

Summary

This study used fMRI to examine brain activity during the processing of ungrammatical sentences. Different brain regions, including the left posterior superior temporal gyrus (STG) and left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), were activated depending on the type of grammatical violation.

More Related Videos

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Psycholinguistics
Cognitive Science

Background:

Language comprehension involves intricate processing of grammatical structures.
Understanding how the brain processes different types of linguistic violations is crucial for cognitive neuroscience.
Previous research suggests distinct neural substrates for syntactic and semantic processing.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the neural correlates of processing morphosyntactic and verb-argument structure violations in German sentences using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
To identify specific brain regions associated with different types of ungrammaticality.
To elucidate the interaction between lexical, syntactic, and semantic features during language comprehension.

Main Methods:

fMRI paradigm involving German perfect tense sentences.
Presentation of sentences with morphosyntactic violations (syntactic feature mismatch) and verb-argument structure violations (unlicensed direct object).
Comparison of brain activity between ungrammatical and grammatically correct sentences.

Main Results:

Morphosyntactically ungrammatical sentences elicited increased brain activity in the left middle to posterior superior temporal gyrus (STG).
Verb-argument structure violations led to brain activations in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) (BA 44).
Evidence for distinct neural patterns corresponding to different types of grammatical errors was observed.

Conclusions:

The left posterior STG is implicated in morphosyntactic processing, likely supporting lexical-syntactic integration.
The left dorsal IFG (BA 44) is involved in processing verb-argument structure.
Language comprehension involves complex interactions between lexical, syntactic, and semantic information processed in distinct neural networks.