Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When I say … intuition.

Medical education·2025
Same author

Diagnostic reasoning and cognitive error in emergency medicine: Implications for teaching and learning.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·2024
Same author

Dual process models of clinical reasoning: The central role of knowledge in diagnostic expertise.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2024
Same author

The influence of viewing time on visual diagnostic accuracy: Less is more.

Medical education·2024
Same author

Task Switching, Multitasking, and Errors: A Psychologic Perspective on the Impact of Interruptions.

Annals of emergency medicine·2021
Same author

Do you hear what you see? Utilizing phonocardiography to enhance proficiency in cardiac auscultation.

Perspectives on medical education·2021
Same journal

Historicizing health professions education research: history as a strategic analytic resource.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

Factors influencing workplace collaboration and learning between resident doctors and senior nurses: a scoping review.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

Grave lessons: a guide to historiographical research in health professions education.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

A scoping review of inquiry in medicine and nursing using Dewey's perspective.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

"Teaching is important, but it's not important": a qualitative study of teacher identity among early-career academics in health professions.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same journal

The Moral Competence Test in healthcare education: a critique based on informal logic.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

Dual processing and diagnostic errors.

Geoff Norman1

  • 1Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, ON, Canada. norman@mcmaster.ca

Advances in Health Sciences Education : Theory and Practice
|August 12, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review explores how dual process and exemplar theories explain diagnostic errors. Findings show both unconscious (System 1) and conscious (System 2) reasoning are equally effective, and using both reduces clinical errors.

More Related Videos

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Reasoning
  • Medical Diagnosis

Background:

  • Diagnostic errors are a significant concern in healthcare.
  • Dual Process theories (System 1 and System 2) and Exemplar theories offer frameworks for understanding categorization and decision-making.
  • Understanding these cognitive processes is crucial for improving diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review psychological theories relevant to diagnostic errors.
  • To compare the effectiveness and error proneness of System 1 and System 2 thinking in clinical reasoning.
  • To evaluate strategies for reducing diagnostic errors.

Main Methods:

  • Review of evidence from Dual Process theories of cognition.
  • Review of evidence from Exemplar theories of categorization.
  • Analysis of studies on clinical reasoning and diagnostic errors based on these theories.

Main Results:

  • Both System 1 (fast, unconscious) and System 2 (slow, conscious) reasoning processes are equally effective in categorization.
  • System 1 is not inherently more prone to cognitive bias or diagnostic error than System 2.
  • Explicitly encouraging clinicians to use both System 1 and System 2 strategies consistently reduces error rates.

Conclusions:

  • Dual Process and Exemplar theories provide valuable insights into diagnostic decision-making.
  • Cognitive strategies, rather than the type of reasoning alone, influence diagnostic accuracy.
  • Interventions promoting the integrated use of both intuitive and analytical thinking can enhance clinical judgment and reduce errors.