Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
Trial and Error and Algorithm01:12

Trial and Error and Algorithm

A problem-solving strategy is a plan of action used to find a solution. Different strategies have distinct action plans. Trial and error involves trying different solutions until one works. For instance, to fix a broken printer, you might check ink levels, ensure the paper tray isn't jammed, and verify the printer's connection to your laptop. This method can be time-consuming but is commonly used. Thomas Edison, for example, used trial and error to find a suitable filament for the light bulb,...
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about the way you...
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Social Traps01:41

Social Traps

Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned more cows, the larger...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The language of gesture: Testing the multimodality-for-compensation account with head and hand emblems of affirmation and negation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Measuring Implicit Approach-Avoidance Tendencies Using Self-Depicting Body Pictures in Female Adults With Bulimia Nervosa, High Body Dissatisfaction and Healthy Controls.

The International journal of eating disorders·2025
Same author

Cognitive plausibility of count-based versus prediction-based word embeddings: A large-scale N400 study.

Biological psychology·2025
Same author

Taboo language across the globe: A multi-lab study.

Behavior research methods·2024
Same author

Semantic congruency modulates the speed-up of multisensory responses.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Multimodal aspects of sentence comprehension: Do facial and color cues interact with processing negated and affirmative sentences?

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

Speeding before and slowing after errors: is it all just strategy?

Carolin Dudschig1, Ines Jentzsch

  • 1School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9JP, UK. cd71@st-andrews.ac.uk

Brain Research
|August 15, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Pre-error speeding is not strategic, but post-error slowing increases with less time between trials, suggesting error evaluation interferes with performance. The Ne/ERN amplitude did not predict post-error slowing.

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
11:41

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation

Published on: February 1, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Response times typically quicken before errors and slow after errors.
  • This is often attributed to strategic adjustments in response thresholds.
  • Recent research suggests error evaluation itself can consume time and hinder subsequent performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate if error evaluation interferes with processing, similar to post-error slowing.
  • Examine if pre-error speeding and post-error slowing share underlying mechanisms.
  • Determine if the Ne/ERN amplitude predicts post-error slowing.

Main Methods:

  • Systematically manipulated the response stimulus interval (RSI).
  • Measured behavioral performance (speed and accuracy) and electrophysiological data (Ne/ERN amplitude).

Main Results:

  • Pre-error speeding was unaffected by RSI, indicating it's not a strategic process.
  • Post-error slowing intensified with shorter RSIs, increasing error proneness.
  • No significant relationship was found between RSI-dependent post-error slowing and Ne/ERN amplitude.

Conclusions:

  • Error evaluation can significantly interfere with subsequent trial processing, especially with short inter-trial intervals.
  • Pre-error speeding may not involve strategic control processes.
  • The amplitude of the Ne/ERN may not directly correlate with the magnitude of subsequent performance adjustments.