Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Isolation of Mouse Interstitial Valve Cells to Study the Calcification of the Aortic Valve In Vitro
Published on: May 10, 2021
Early calcification of the aortic Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly
Jose Rubio Alvarez1, Juan Sierra, Marino Vega
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Spain. framan1@hotmail.com
Insights
The Mitroflow A12 bioprosthesis showed suboptimal performance in elderly patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Freedom from structural valve dysfunction was only 55.8% at 10 years, necessitating reoperation in 4% of cases.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Aortic valve replacement is a common procedure in elderly patients.
- Pericardial bioprostheses are frequently used for aortic valve replacement.
- The Mitroflow A12 bioprosthesis is a specific type of pericardial bioprosthesis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term performance of the Mitroflow A12 pericardial bioprosthesis in elderly patients.
- To assess the rates of structural valve dysfunction and bioprosthetic valve deterioration.
- To determine the need for reoperation due to bioprosthetic valve failure.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study of 491 patients over 70 years old receiving the Mitroflow A12 bioprosthesis between 1993 and 2006.
- Routine postoperative Echo-Doppler studies were performed at discharge, 1 month, and annually thereafter.
- Follow-up included assessment of structural valve dysfunction and need for reoperation.
Main Results:
- Twenty patients (4%) required a second aortic valve replacement due to bioprosthetic valve dysfunction, primarily calcified stenosis.
- Freedom from structural valve dysfunction was 95.3% at 5 years and 55.8% at 10 years.
- Freedom from bioprosthetic deterioration was 85.7% at 5 years and 33.5% at 10 years.
Conclusions:
- The Mitroflow A12 pericardial bioprosthesis demonstrates suboptimal long-term performance in elderly patients.
- High rates of structural valve dysfunction and deterioration necessitate reoperation.
- Alternative bioprosthetic options may be considered for this patient population.
Background:
We report our experience in the elderly with aortic valve replacement using the Mitroflow A12 pericardial bioprosthesis.
Methods:
From January 1993 to January 2006, 491 patients over the age of 70 years received an aortic Mitroflow A12 bioprosthesis implantation. Concomitant procedures included coronary artery bypass grafting in 20% of patients. All patients had routine postoperative Echo-Doppler studies at discharge, one month and a mean of 11.1 months after surgery and annually thereafter.
Results:
Twenty (4%) patients underwent a second aortic valve replacement due to bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (Group 2). Calcified stenosis was the most common finding at reoperation (98%). Median time to valve reoperation was 76 months. Of patients requiring reoperation, median age at first and second implantation was 73 (70-78) and 79 (76-83) years, respectively. For all patients, freedom from structural valve dysfunction (SVD) was 95+/-3% at 5 years and 55.8+/-2% at 10 years. Bioprosthetic valve deterioration was identified in 27 patients (Group 1). Median age of these patients at first operation and at diagnosis of deterioration by echo was 75 (70-84) and 77 (70-82) years, respectively. The median interval between operation and detection of bioprosthesis valve deterioration was 46 months. Among the total patient population, freedom from bioprosthetic deterioration was 85.7+/-2% at 5 years and 33.5+/-4% at 10 years.
Conclusion:
The Mitroflow A12 pericardial bioprosthesis provides less than optimal performance in elderly patients.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
