Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

11:39
Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
Published on: September 7, 2022
Evaluation of tooth-click triggering and speech recognition in assistive technology for computer access
Tyler Simpson1, Michel Gauthier, Arthur Prochazka
1University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
|August 15, 2009
Summary
Tooth clicks offer a faster, hands-free computer control method for individuals with tetraplegia compared to speech recognition. This technology, using either an optical or gyrometer head mouse, enhances computer accessibility for those with spinal cord injuries.
Area of Science:
- Rehabilitation Engineering
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Assistive Technology
Background:
- Computer access is crucial for employment and leisure post-spinal cord injury.
- Prior research demonstrated tooth-click devices with optical head mice for computer control in tetraplegia.
- This study evaluates alternative assistive technologies for computer interaction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of tooth clicks versus speech recognition for computer control.
- To compare the performance of optical head mice versus gyrometer head mice.
- To assess hands-free computer control for individuals with tetraplegia.
Main Methods:
- Six able-bodied and three tetraplegic participants controlled a computer using tooth clicks or speech recognition, and optical or gyrometer head mice.
- Participants performed cursor movements and mouse clicks on computer-displayed targets.
- Task completion time for target acquisition and clicking was recorded.
Main Results:
- Tooth clicks, with either head mouse type, enabled hands-free control at up to 22% of standard mouse speed.
- Tooth clicks significantly outperformed speech recognition in generating mouse clicks with both head mouse devices.
- Both head mouse types showed comparable performance when paired with tooth clicks.
Conclusions:
- Tooth-click detection is more effective than speech recognition for computer control in individuals with tetraplegia.
- This system shows potential for improving computer access and independence for people with spinal cord injuries.
- Further development of tooth-click interfaces could enhance digital inclusion for disabled populations.
