Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Standards of Care II

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

In certain scenarios, in vitro dissolution tests can replace in vivo bioequivalence studies. This is particularly true when a drug product, though available in varying strengths, maintains proportional similarity in its active and inactive ingredients. In such cases, the need for in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strength variants may be waived, provided dissolution tests and in vivo studies on the highest strength yield satisfactory results.Bioequivalence can be indicated through...

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Improving outcomes of patients living with psoriatic arthritis: The Observational Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI-PsA) registry: Rationale, Methodology and Preliminary Data of 18 Months Follow-up.

PloS one·2026

Same author

Psychometric Evaluation and Discriminative Validity of the Short-Form Brief Pain Inventory Across Nociceptive, Neuropathic, and Nociplastic Pain Mechanisms.

The journal of pain·2026

Same author

Effects and costs of a group-based educational intervention to reduce opioid use in people with chronic pain: I-WOTCH RCT.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026

Same author

Ten Years of ECHO Chronic Pain and Opioid Stewardship in Ontario: Impact and Future Directions.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Same author

Treatment sequences and lines of therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a real-world evaluation of retention and effectiveness.

Clinical and experimental rheumatology·2025

Same author

Leveraging technologies to upskill primary care providers in person-centred pain care.

Pain·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group.

Andrea D Furlan¹, Victoria Pennick, Claire Bombardier

¹Institute for Work and Health, 481 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. afurlan@iwh.on.ca

|August 15, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Updated guidelines help researchers conduct high-quality systematic reviews for neck and back pain treatments. These method guidelines ensure rigorous study design, data analysis, and reporting for spinal disorder research.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Clinical Epidemiology
Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

Previous method guidelines for systematic reviews on neck and back pain were published in 1997 and updated in 2003.
Evolving methodologic evidence and changing standards necessitated a revision of existing guidelines.

Framework:

The revised guidelines incorporate new methodologic evidence and align with The Cochrane Collaboration's updated standards.
Recommendations cover objectives, literature search, inclusion criteria, risk of bias assessment, data extraction, data analysis, and review updating.

Implementation:

The Cochrane Back Review Group convened in June 2006 to review and revise the guidelines.
A working draft was circulated for comment and checked for consistency with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

Implications:

The updated guidelines adopt the GRADE approach for assessing the quality of evidence for patient-centered outcomes.
These revised guidelines aim to improve the planning, execution, and evaluation of systematic reviews in spinal disorders.