Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation01:09

Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation

The empirical rule, also known as the three-sigma rule, allows a statistician to interpret the standard deviation in a normally distributed dataset. The rule states that 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation from the mean, 95% lies within two standard deviations from the mean, and 99.7% lies within three standard deviations from the mean. Additionally, this rule is also called the 68-95-99.7 rule.
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence demands action: An invitation to share the burden of proof.

Epilepsia·2025
Same author

Exploring Participant-Generated Examples of Social Change: A Two-Stage, Mixed Methods, Delphi Study.

Journal of community psychology·2025
Same author

Dravet syndrome: From neurodevelopmental to neurodegenerative disease?

Epilepsia·2025
Same author

Health professionals' perspectives on psychological distress and meeting patients' support needs in rheumatology care settings: A qualitative study.

Musculoskeletal care·2023
Same author

UK clinical and community psychology: Exploring personal and professional connections.

Journal of community psychology·2022
Same author

Student mental health in higher education: the contextual influence of "cuts, competition & comparison".

The British journal of educational psychology·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Considering the implication of variations within Delphi research.

Miles Thompson1

  • 1Bath Centre for Pain Services, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Upper Borough Walls, UK. miles.thompson@rnhrd.nhs.uk

Family Practice
|August 18, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Delphi research method uses sequential questionnaires to reach expert consensus in areas lacking established knowledge. This paper reviews its applications and common modifications in medical, social, and psychological research.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Medical research
  • Social sciences
  • Psychological research

Background:

  • Delphi research is increasingly utilized in fields lacking established theories.
  • It involves sequential questionnaires to achieve expert consensus.
  • Experts are believed to possess crucial information in these domains.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of the Delphi research technique.
  • To explain common modifications and their implications.
  • To suggest future directions for Delphi research methodology.

Main Methods:

  • Sequential administration of questionnaires to a panel of experts.
  • Iterative feedback and revision process to foster consensus.
  • Analysis of expert opinions in areas with limited existing knowledge.

Main Results:

  • The literature shows variations in Delphi application, including restricted expert responses, altered expert groups, and varied termination points.
  • These modifications can influence the consensus-building process and outcomes.
  • Understanding these variations is crucial for appropriate application.

Conclusions:

  • The Delphi method is adaptable but requires careful consideration of modifications.
  • Further research can refine Delphi techniques for enhanced reliability and validity.
  • Standardized approaches with acknowledged flexibility are recommended for future Delphi studies.