Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other01:20

Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group effort.
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation01:30

Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

Self-evaluation is the process by which individuals assess their abilities, behaviors, and characteristics based on feedback from others. Charles H. Cooley observed that a person’s self-perception is primarily influenced by how others see and judge them. He suggested that individuals form their identities based on their interpretations of others' reactions. As a result, social interactions play a crucial role in shaping self-esteem and personal identity. These external evaluations often blend...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about the way you...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Robust associations of emotional intelligence with human flourishing: A second-order meta-analysis.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Social support and psychological adjustment: A quantitative synthesis of 60 meta-analyses.

The American psychologist·2024
Same author

Empathic forecasting of the big-fish-little-pond effect.

Cognition & emotion·2023
Same author

The regional big-fish-little-pond effect: Evidence from national and subnational comparisons.

The British journal of social psychology·2023
Same author

Big five personality traits and performance: A quantitative synthesis of 50+ meta-analyses.

Journal of personality·2021
Same author

The better-than-average effect in comparative self-evaluation: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.

Psychological bulletin·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Contextual neglect, self-evaluation, and the frog-pond effect.

Ethan Zell1, Mark D Alicke

  • 1Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA. ez654504@ohio.edu

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|August 19, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People often overlook broader group comparisons, focusing instead on immediate social standing. This "contextual neglect" occurs because local social comparison data overshadows more general, diagnostic information.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

A Modified Mirror Test as a Visual Guide for the Self-awareness Trait in Wild Antarctica Penguins, Pygoscelis adeliae
04:51

A Modified Mirror Test as a Visual Guide for the Self-awareness Trait in Wild Antarctica Penguins, Pygoscelis adeliae

Published on: July 8, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

A Modified Mirror Test as a Visual Guide for the Self-awareness Trait in Wild Antarctica Penguins, Pygoscelis adeliae
04:51

A Modified Mirror Test as a Visual Guide for the Self-awareness Trait in Wild Antarctica Penguins, Pygoscelis adeliae

Published on: July 8, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Social Cognition

Background:

  • Social comparisons inform individuals about their standing within a group (intragroup) and the group's standing relative to others (intergroup).
  • Understanding the differential impact of these comparison types is crucial for self-evaluation and affect.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relative influence of intragroup versus intergroup social comparisons on self-evaluations and affect.
  • To identify the psychological mechanisms underlying the observed patterns of social comparison.

Main Methods:

  • Five studies were conducted, employing various experimental designs to manipulate the availability and type of social comparison information.
  • Participants' self-evaluations and affective states were measured following exposure to intragroup and/or intergroup comparison data.

Main Results:

  • Intragroup comparison feedback consistently influenced self-evaluations and affect.
  • Intergroup comparison information significantly impacted outcomes only when intragroup information was absent, a phenomenon termed "contextual neglect."
  • Contextual neglect arises because local comparison data often supersedes higher-level, more diagnostic group data, despite individuals recognizing the latter's superior diagnosticity.

Conclusions:

  • Intragroup social comparisons exert a primary influence on self-perception and emotional states.
  • Individuals exhibit a tendency towards "contextual neglect," prioritizing readily available local comparison data over broader intergroup comparisons.
  • This reliance on less diagnostic, local information highlights a potential bias in social judgment and self-assessment.