Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

One-channel Cell-attached Patch-clamp Recording
Published on: June 9, 2014
Different pathways for activation and deactivation in CaV1.2: a minimal gating model
Stanislav Beyl1, Philipp Kügler, Michaela Kudrnac
1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Abstract:
Point mutations in pore-lining S6 segments of CaV1.2 shift the voltage dependence of activation into the hyperpolarizing direction and significantly decelerate current activation and deactivation. Here, we analyze theses changes in channel gating in terms of a circular four-state model accounting for an activation R-A-O and a deactivation O-D-R pathway. Transitions between resting-closed (R) and activated-closed (A) states (rate constants x(V) and y(V)) and open (O) and deactivated-open (D) states (u(V) and w(V)) describe voltage-dependent sensor movements. Voltage-independent pore openings and closures during activation (A-O) and deactivation (D-R) are described by rate constants alpha and beta, and gamma and delta, respectively. Rate constants were determined for 16-channel constructs assuming that pore mutations in IIS6 do not affect the activating transition of the voltage-sensing machinery (x(V) and y(V)). Estimated model parameters of 15 CaV1.2 constructs well describe the activation and deactivation processes. Voltage dependence of the "pore-releasing" sensor movement ((x(V)) was much weaker than the voltage dependence of "pore-locking" sensor movement (y(V)). Our data suggest that changes in membrane voltage are more efficient in closing than in opening CaV1.2. The model failed to reproduce current kinetics of mutation A780P that was, however, accurately fitted with individually adjusted x(V) and y(V). We speculate that structural changes induced by a proline substitution in this position may disturb the voltage-sensing domain.
Insights
Point mutations in CaV1.2 channels alter voltage-dependent gating. A four-state model reveals distinct sensor movement efficiencies, suggesting voltage changes are more effective at closing channels than opening them.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Molecular Biology
- Biophysics
Background:
- CaV1.2 channels are crucial for cardiac excitation-contraction coupling.
- Point mutations in S6 segments of CaV1.2 channels significantly alter their gating properties, affecting activation and deactivation kinetics.
- Understanding these alterations is key to deciphering channel function and dysfunction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the gating changes in CaV1.2 channels caused by pore-lining S6 segment mutations.
- To develop and apply a four-state circular model to quantitatively describe these gating alterations.
- To investigate the differential voltage dependence of sensor movements during channel activation and deactivation.
Main Methods:
- Development of a circular four-state kinetic model (R-A-O-D) for CaV1.2 channel gating.
- Analysis of voltage-dependent rate constants (x(V), y(V), u(V), w(V)) and voltage-independent rate constants (alpha, beta, gamma, delta).
- Fitting the model to experimental data from 15 mutated CaV1.2 channel constructs.
Main Results:
- The four-state model successfully described activation and deactivation kinetics for most CaV1.2 constructs.
- The voltage dependence of the 'pore-releasing' sensor movement (x(V)) was found to be weaker than that of the 'pore-locking' sensor movement (y(V)).
- Model analysis suggests that membrane voltage changes are more efficient in closing CaV1.2 channels than in opening them.
Conclusions:
- The study provides a quantitative model for CaV1.2 channel gating alterations due to S6 mutations.
- Findings highlight asymmetric voltage sensitivities in the channel's voltage-sensing machinery.
- The mutation A780P suggests proline substitutions may disrupt voltage-sensing domain function, requiring further investigation.
Related Concept Videos
Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptor: Gating Mechanism
The Role of Ion Channels in Neuronal Computation
Sometimes a single EPSP is strong enough to induce an action potential in the postsynaptic neuron. However, multiple presynaptic inputs must often create EPSPs around the same time for the postsynaptic neuron to be sufficiently depolarized to fire an action potential.
Ligand-gated Ion Channels
Three Subfamilies of Ligand-gated Ion Channels
Ligand-gated ion channels fall into three subfamilies. The 'Cys-loop' includes the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), glycine, and 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors. The second one is the 'Pore-loop' channels that include the...
Ligand-gated Ion Channels
Three Subfamilies of Ligand-gated Ion Channels
Ligand-gated ion channels fall into three subfamilies. The 'Cys-loop' includes the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), glycine, and 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors. The second one is the 'Pore-loop' channels that include the...
Non-gated Ion Channels
Compared to the gated ion channels, the non-gated channels, also known as leakage or passive channels, have no gating mechanism.
Non-gated Ion Channels
Compared to the gated ion channels, the non-gated channels, also known as leakage or passive channels, have no gating mechanism.

