Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
Longitudinal Studies01:26

Longitudinal Studies

Longitudinal studies are also widely used in other medical and social science fields. For instance, in cardiovascular research, they can monitor patients' health over decades to identify risk factors for heart disease, such as high cholesterol or smoking, and evaluate the long-term effectiveness of preventive measures. Similarly, in mental health studies, researchers might follow individuals from adolescence into adulthood to understand the development and progression of conditions like...
Data Collection by Observations01:08

Data Collection by Observations

Data collection refers to a systematic way of obtaining, observing, measuring, and analyzing accurate information. Observational studies are one of the most widely used methods of data collection. It involves collecting data by observing the behavior and physical characteristics of a sample without making any modifications to the sample.
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Excipient of medication the probable cause of urticaria in a boy with autism.

Therapeutic advances in drug safety·2018
Same author

The challenge of Mendelian randomization approach.

Current medical research and opinion·2017
Same author

Further approaches to reduce the cost of renal replacement therapy.

Nature reviews. Nephrology·2017
Same author

Obesity and kidney disease: hidden consequences of the epidemic.

Future science OA·2017
Same author

An unusual localization of chondroblastoma: The triradiate cartilage; from a case report a reconstructive technique proposal with imaging evolution.

Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma·2017
Same author

Propensity to calcification as a pathway to renal hypoxia in chronic kidney disease and in hypertension.

Journal of hypertension·2017
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cohort studies: prospective versus retrospective.

Anne M Euser1, Carmine Zoccali, Kitty J Jager

  • 1Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Nephron. Clinical Practice
|August 20, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cohort studies are effective for analyzing multiple exposures and outcomes, especially for rare or non-randomizable factors in nephrology research. While susceptible to bias, they offer accurate, efficient, and generalizable insights when limitations are understood.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Epidemiology
  • Clinical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Cohort studies are a robust observational design.
  • They are well-suited for investigating multiple exposures and outcomes simultaneously.
  • Ideal for rare exposures or situations where randomization is infeasible.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of cohort studies in nephrology.
  • To highlight the strengths and weaknesses of this study design.
  • To emphasize the generalizability of findings from cohort studies.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of prospective and retrospective cohort study designs.
  • Analysis of advantages including accuracy and efficiency.
  • Identification of potential limitations such as confounding by indication and selection bias.

Main Results:

  • Cohort studies provide high accuracy and efficiency.
  • Potential for confounding and bias must be acknowledged.
  • Results are generally highly generalizable.

Conclusions:

  • Cohort studies are a potent research design in nephrology.
  • Understanding and mitigating bias are crucial for valid results.
  • This design yields broadly applicable findings in kidney research.