Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Ordinal Level of Measurement

Ordinal Level of Measurement

The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks in the...

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...

Confidence Intervals

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...

Odds Ratio

Odds Ratio

The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Genotype epigenome phenotype integration reveals peripheral immune contributions to type I bipolar disorder.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Multimorbidity in Atrial Fibrillation: Impact on Outcomes.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026

Same author

Artificial intelligence biomarker detects high-risk childhood asthma subgroup for respiratory infections and exacerbations.

The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology·2025

Same author

Implications of the choice of method to identify major depressive disorder in large research cohorts.

Journal of mood and anxiety disorders·2025

Same author

Neighborhood characteristics and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: A large cohort study in the Midwest.

Heart rhythm O2·2025

Same author

Housing Characteristics of Areas With More Falls by Older Adults Living in Single-Family Detached Dwellings: A Cohort Study Using Geospatial Analysis.

Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Simultaneous confidence intervals using ordinal effect measures for ordered categorical outcomes.

¹Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, U.S.A. ryu.euijung@mayo.edu

Statistics in Medicine

|August 20, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method for simultaneous confidence intervals for ordinal effect sizes, outperforming existing techniques in statistical comparisons for ordered categorical data.

More Related Videos

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Area of Science:

Statistics
Biostatistics
Psychometrics

Background:

Comparing groups with ordered categorical outcomes is common in research.
Traditional cumulative logit models may not fully capture ordinal effect sizes.
Existing methods for confidence intervals have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

To present a novel method for constructing simultaneous confidence intervals for ordinal effect size measures.
To evaluate the performance of this new method compared to existing approaches.
To provide a robust statistical tool for analyzing ordered categorical data.

Main Methods:

Utilizing an ordinal effect size measure as an alternative to the cumulative logit model.
Employing the studentized range distribution with a score test statistic.
Conducting a simulation study to assess performance.

Main Results:

The proposed method demonstrates good coverage probability in simulations.
The new method outperforms Bonferroni correction with Wald-type statistics.
It also shows advantages over methods using multivariate normal/t-distributions.

Conclusions:

The proposed method for simultaneous confidence intervals is a valuable alternative for analyzing ordered categorical data.
This approach offers improved accuracy and reliability in statistical comparisons.
It provides researchers with a more effective tool for understanding group differences.